Message from the Editors to Our Reviewers

José G. Merino; Olga Ciccarelli; Bradford B. Worrall; Anthony A. Amato; Rebecca Burch; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jennifer Graves; Peter Hedera; Linda A. Hershey; Barbara C. Jobst; Renée A. Shellhaas

doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241

Message from the Editors to Our Reviewers

José G. Merino
, Olga Ciccarelli
, Bradford B. Worrall
, Anthony A. Amato
, Rebecca Burch
, Jonathan Graff-Radford
, Jennifer Graves
, Peter Hedera
, Linda A. Hershey
, Barbara C. Jobst
, Renée A. Shellhaas

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

As we look back on 2020 and early 2021, we have immense gratitude to you, the dedicated reviewers for Neurology®. Over the past year, we faced many challenges, including a large increase in the number of submissions and the need for expedited review for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related manuscripts, and this put enormous demands on our reviewers. Despite the sharp increase in submissions in 2020, from 5,391 in 2019 to 7,548 (40% increase), the time that our reviewers took to complete their work decreased in 2020 (22 days) compared with 2019 (28 days). Peer review is essential to what we do, and the success of the journal is due in large part to you.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3-11
Number of pages	9
Journal	Neurology
Volume	97
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241
State	Published - Jul 6 2021

Access to Document

10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241

Cite this

@article{1c64767e1f5f4a6f80c228ccf5326682,

title = "Message from the Editors to Our Reviewers",

abstract = "As we look back on 2020 and early 2021, we have immense gratitude to you, the dedicated reviewers for Neurology{\textregistered}. Over the past year, we faced many challenges, including a large increase in the number of submissions and the need for expedited review for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related manuscripts, and this put enormous demands on our reviewers. Despite the sharp increase in submissions in 2020, from 5,391 in 2019 to 7,548 (40\% increase), the time that our reviewers took to complete their work decreased in 2020 (22 days) compared with 2019 (28 days). Peer review is essential to what we do, and the success of the journal is due in large part to you.",

author = "Merino, \{Jos{\'e} G.\} and Olga Ciccarelli and Worrall, \{Bradford B.\} and Amato, \{Anthony A.\} and Rebecca Burch and Jonathan Graff-Radford and Jennifer Graves and Peter Hedera and Hershey, \{Linda A.\} and Jobst, \{Barbara C.\} and Shellhaas, \{Ren{\'e}e A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} American Academy of Neurology.",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241",

language = "English",

volume = "97",

pages = "3--11",

journal = "Neurology",

issn = "0028-3878",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Message from the Editors to Our Reviewers

AU - Merino, José G.

AU - Ciccarelli, Olga

AU - Worrall, Bradford B.

AU - Amato, Anthony A.

AU - Burch, Rebecca

AU - Graff-Radford, Jonathan

AU - Graves, Jennifer

AU - Hedera, Peter

AU - Hershey, Linda A.

AU - Jobst, Barbara C.

AU - Shellhaas, Renée A.

PY - 2021/7/6

Y1 - 2021/7/6

N2 - As we look back on 2020 and early 2021, we have immense gratitude to you, the dedicated reviewers for Neurology®. Over the past year, we faced many challenges, including a large increase in the number of submissions and the need for expedited review for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related manuscripts, and this put enormous demands on our reviewers. Despite the sharp increase in submissions in 2020, from 5,391 in 2019 to 7,548 (40% increase), the time that our reviewers took to complete their work decreased in 2020 (22 days) compared with 2019 (28 days). Peer review is essential to what we do, and the success of the journal is due in large part to you.

AB - As we look back on 2020 and early 2021, we have immense gratitude to you, the dedicated reviewers for Neurology®. Over the past year, we faced many challenges, including a large increase in the number of submissions and the need for expedited review for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related manuscripts, and this put enormous demands on our reviewers. Despite the sharp increase in submissions in 2020, from 5,391 in 2019 to 7,548 (40% increase), the time that our reviewers took to complete their work decreased in 2020 (22 days) compared with 2019 (28 days). Peer review is essential to what we do, and the success of the journal is due in large part to you.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85170832203

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012241

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85170832203

SN - 0028-3878

VL - 97

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

IS - 1

ER -

Message from the Editors to Our Reviewers

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this