Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests

  • Lisa K. Fazio
  • , Pooja K. Agarwal
  • , Elizabeth J. Marsh
  • , Henry L. Roediger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multiple-choice testing has both positive and negative consequences for performance on later tests. Prior testing increases the number of questions answered correctly on a later test but also increases the likelihood that questions will be answered with lures from the previous multiple-choice test (Roediger & Marsh, 2005). Prior research has shown that the positive effects of testing persist over a delay, but no one has examined the durability of the negative effects of testing. To address this, subjects took multiple-choice and cued recall tests (on subsets of questions) both immediately and a week after studying. Although delay reduced both the positive and negative testing effects, both still occurred after 1 week, especially if the multiple-choice test had also been delayed. These results are consistent with the argument that recollection underlies both the positive and negative testing effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-418
Number of pages12
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this