Melanoma thickness and histology predict sentinel lymph node status

Christophe L. Nguyen, Ed F. McClay, David J. Cole, Paul H. O'Brien, William E. Gillanders, John S. Metcalf, John C. Maize, Paul L. Baron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear which patients with melanoma will benefit most from lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether primary melanoma histopathologic features could be applied to predict sentinel node status. Methods: One hundred twelve patients underwent sentinel node biopsy between May 1995 and August 1999. Reported histologic features were assessed for predictive value by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The sentinel node was located successfully in 105 of the 112 patients (94%). Twenty-one of these 105 patients (20%) had sentinel nodes that were positive for metastatic disease. Multivariate analyses revealed that tumor thickness greater than 1.5 mm (P = 0.01), ulceration (P <0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.05) predicted the presence of micrometastases. Conclusions: The presence of unfavorable histopathology such as ulceration and lymphovascular invasion may identify a group of patients with thin melanomas who would benefit from sentinel lymphadenectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-11
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume181
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 24 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Lymphovascular invasion
  • Melanoma
  • Sentinel lymphadenectomy
  • Ulceration

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Melanoma thickness and histology predict sentinel lymph node status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Nguyen, C. L., McClay, E. F., Cole, D. J., O'Brien, P. H., Gillanders, W. E., Metcalf, J. S., Maize, J. C., & Baron, P. L. (2001). Melanoma thickness and histology predict sentinel lymph node status. American journal of surgery, 181(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00533-X