TY - JOUR
T1 - Meet your surgical team
T2 - The impact of a resident-led quality improvement project on patient satisfaction
AU - Craig-Schapiro, Rebecca
AU - DiBrito, Sandra R.
AU - Overton, Heidi N.
AU - Taylor, James P.
AU - Fransman, Ryan B.
AU - Haut, Elliott R.
AU - Sacks, Bethany C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Patients often have an incomplete understanding of the levels of training and roles of the various surgical providers in teaching hospitals, leading to patient confusion and dissatisfaction. Methods: Pre-intervention discharge surveys were administered to gastrointestinal surgery inpatients (10/2016–02/2017) to evaluate sentiments regarding their surgical team. During the intervention period (02/2017–05/2017), patients at admission received “facesheets” containing team member profiles, photos, training level, and roles. These patients were evaluated using the survey, and pre- and post-intervention scores compared. Results: 153 pre- and 100 post-intervention surveys were collected. There was a significant increase in patients reporting it was important to know the surgical team members and that they knew team member roles (p ≤ 0.05). Scores in every domain of the satisfaction survey improved in the post-intervention period, although not reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Improving how patients perceive their interactions with their surgical team has implications on patient satisfaction and hospital quality metrics.
AB - Background: Patients often have an incomplete understanding of the levels of training and roles of the various surgical providers in teaching hospitals, leading to patient confusion and dissatisfaction. Methods: Pre-intervention discharge surveys were administered to gastrointestinal surgery inpatients (10/2016–02/2017) to evaluate sentiments regarding their surgical team. During the intervention period (02/2017–05/2017), patients at admission received “facesheets” containing team member profiles, photos, training level, and roles. These patients were evaluated using the survey, and pre- and post-intervention scores compared. Results: 153 pre- and 100 post-intervention surveys were collected. There was a significant increase in patients reporting it was important to know the surgical team members and that they knew team member roles (p ≤ 0.05). Scores in every domain of the satisfaction survey improved in the post-intervention period, although not reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Improving how patients perceive their interactions with their surgical team has implications on patient satisfaction and hospital quality metrics.
KW - Facesheet
KW - Patient satisfaction
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Surgical team
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054779919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.056
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.056
M3 - Article
C2 - 30177240
AN - SCOPUS:85054779919
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 216
SP - 793
EP - 799
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 4
ER -