Medicines for the mind: Policy-based "Pull" incentives for creating breakthrough CNS drugs

Dennis W. Choi, Robert Armitage, Linda S. Brady, Timothy Coetzee, William Fisher, Steven Hyman, Atul Pande, Steven Paul, William Potter, Benjamin Roin, Todd Sherer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations


Several large pharmaceutical companies have selectively downsized their neuroscience research divisions, reflecting a growing view that developing drugs to treat brain diseases is more difficult and often more time-consuming and expensive than developing drugs for other therapeutic areas, and thus represents a weak area for investment. These withdrawals reduce global neuroscience translational capabilities and pose a serious challenge to society's interests in ameliorating the impact of nervous system diseases. While the path forward ultimately lies in improving understandings of disease mechanisms, many promising therapeutic approaches have already been identified, and rebalancing the underlying risk/reward calculus could help keep companies engaged in making CNS drugs. One way to do this that would not require upfront funding is to change the policies that regulate market returns for the most-needed breakthrough drugs. The broader neuroscience community including clinicians and patients should convene to develop and advocate for such policy changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-563
Number of pages10
Issue number3
StatePublished - Nov 5 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Medicines for the mind: Policy-based "Pull" incentives for creating breakthrough CNS drugs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this