TY - JOUR
T1 - Medicare’s Bundled Payments For Care Improvement Advanced Model
T2 - Impact On High-Risk Beneficiaries
AU - Joynt Maddox, Karen E.
AU - Orav, E. John
AU - Zheng, Jie
AU - Epstein, Arnold M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Project HOPE-The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Medicare’s Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model (BPCI-A) is a voluntary Alternative Payment Model in which participating hospitals are held accountable for ninety-day episodes of care. To meet spending targets, hospitals must either decrease utilization or attract a less sick patient population; this could lead to the elimination of necessary care or avoidance of patients with medical or social vulnerability. We used publicly available data on BPCI-A participation, along with Medicare claims from the period 2017–19, to examine patient selection, changes in Medicare payment, and key clinical outcomes among three groups: patients with frailty, patients with multimorbidity, and patients with dual enrollment (both Medicare and Medicaid). We found no consistent change in patient selection associated with BPCI-A participation. Patients with frailty, multimorbidity, or dual enrollment were more expensive at baseline, but Medicare payments decreased similarly in these groups compared with lower-risk patients. There were no differential negative changes in clinical outcomes between BPCI-A participants and nonparticipants among patients with medical or social vulnerability.
AB - Medicare’s Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model (BPCI-A) is a voluntary Alternative Payment Model in which participating hospitals are held accountable for ninety-day episodes of care. To meet spending targets, hospitals must either decrease utilization or attract a less sick patient population; this could lead to the elimination of necessary care or avoidance of patients with medical or social vulnerability. We used publicly available data on BPCI-A participation, along with Medicare claims from the period 2017–19, to examine patient selection, changes in Medicare payment, and key clinical outcomes among three groups: patients with frailty, patients with multimorbidity, and patients with dual enrollment (both Medicare and Medicaid). We found no consistent change in patient selection associated with BPCI-A participation. Patients with frailty, multimorbidity, or dual enrollment were more expensive at baseline, but Medicare payments decreased similarly in these groups compared with lower-risk patients. There were no differential negative changes in clinical outcomes between BPCI-A participants and nonparticipants among patients with medical or social vulnerability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141398388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00138
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00138
M3 - Article
C2 - 36343313
AN - SCOPUS:85141398388
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 41
SP - 1661
EP - 1669
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 11
ER -