TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms of lumbar spine “flattening” in adult spinal deformity
T2 - defining changes in shape that occur relative to a normative population
AU - ISSG
AU - Lafage, Renaud
AU - Mota, Frank
AU - Khalifé, Marc
AU - Protopsaltis, Themistocles
AU - Passias, Peter G.
AU - Kim, Han Jo
AU - Line, Breton
AU - Elysée, Jonathan
AU - Mundis, Gregory
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.
AU - Ames, Christopher P.
AU - Klineberg, Eric O.
AU - Gupta, Munish C.
AU - Burton, Douglas C.
AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.
AU - Bess, Shay
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Schwab, Frank J.
AU - Lafage, Virginie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Purpose: Previous work comparing ASD to a normative population demonstrated that a large proportion of lumbar lordosis is lost proximally (L1-L4). The current study expands on these findings by collectively investigating regional angles and spinal contours. Methods: 119 asymptomatic volunteers with full-body free-standing radiographs were used to identify age-and-PI models of each Vertebra Pelvic Angle (VPA) from L5 to T10. These formulas were then applied to a cohort of primary surgical ASD patients without coronal malalignment. Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) was defined as the offset between age-and-PI normative value and pre-operative alignment. Spine shapes defined by VPAs were compared and analyzed using paired t-tests. Results: 362 ASD patients were identified (age = 64.4 ± 13, 57.1% females). Compared to their age-and-PI normative values, patients demonstrated a significant loss in LL of 17 ± 19° in the following distribution: 14.1% had “No loss” (mean = 0.1 ± 2.3), 22.9% with 10°-loss (mean = 9.9 ± 2.9), 22.1% with 20°-loss (mean = 20.0 ± 2.8), and 29.3% with 30°-loss (mean = 33.8 ± 6.0). “No loss” patients’ spine was slightly posterior to the normative shape from L4 to T10 (VPA difference of 2°), while superimposed on the normative one from S1 to L2 and became anterior at L1 in the “10°-loss” group. As LL loss increased, ASD and normative shapes offset extended caudally to L3 for the “20°-loss” group and L4 for the “30°-loss” group. Conclusion: As LL loss increases, the difference between ASD and normative shapes first occurs proximally and then progresses incrementally caudally. Understanding spinal contour and LL loss location may be key to achieving sustainable correction by identifying optimal and personalized postoperative shapes.
AB - Purpose: Previous work comparing ASD to a normative population demonstrated that a large proportion of lumbar lordosis is lost proximally (L1-L4). The current study expands on these findings by collectively investigating regional angles and spinal contours. Methods: 119 asymptomatic volunteers with full-body free-standing radiographs were used to identify age-and-PI models of each Vertebra Pelvic Angle (VPA) from L5 to T10. These formulas were then applied to a cohort of primary surgical ASD patients without coronal malalignment. Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) was defined as the offset between age-and-PI normative value and pre-operative alignment. Spine shapes defined by VPAs were compared and analyzed using paired t-tests. Results: 362 ASD patients were identified (age = 64.4 ± 13, 57.1% females). Compared to their age-and-PI normative values, patients demonstrated a significant loss in LL of 17 ± 19° in the following distribution: 14.1% had “No loss” (mean = 0.1 ± 2.3), 22.9% with 10°-loss (mean = 9.9 ± 2.9), 22.1% with 20°-loss (mean = 20.0 ± 2.8), and 29.3% with 30°-loss (mean = 33.8 ± 6.0). “No loss” patients’ spine was slightly posterior to the normative shape from L4 to T10 (VPA difference of 2°), while superimposed on the normative one from S1 to L2 and became anterior at L1 in the “10°-loss” group. As LL loss increased, ASD and normative shapes offset extended caudally to L3 for the “20°-loss” group and L4 for the “30°-loss” group. Conclusion: As LL loss increases, the difference between ASD and normative shapes first occurs proximally and then progresses incrementally caudally. Understanding spinal contour and LL loss location may be key to achieving sustainable correction by identifying optimal and personalized postoperative shapes.
KW - Adult spinal deformity
KW - Flat back
KW - Lumbar lordosis
KW - Spinal shape
KW - Vertebral pelvic angle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199787320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-024-08422-3
DO - 10.1007/s00586-024-08422-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 39068280
AN - SCOPUS:85199787320
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 33
SP - 3842
EP - 3850
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 10
ER -