TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanism of membrane fusion induced by vesicular stomatitis virus G protein
AU - Kima, Irene S.
AU - Jenni, Simon
AU - Stanifer, Megan L.
AU - Roth, Eatai
AU - Whelan, Sean P.J.
AU - Van Oijen, Antoine M.
AU - Harrison, Stephen C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Anna Loveland and Joe Loparo for help with TIRF microscopy and discussions; Amy Lee and David Cureton for help with virus growth and purification; Erick Matsen and Kyung-Suk Kim for initial discussions on the model; Maria Ericsson and the Harvard Medical School Cell Biology Electron Microscopy Facility; and Raffaele Potami for help with setting up parallel computing. I.S.K. acknowledges a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. The research was supported by NIH Grant CA-13202 to S.C.H., who is an Investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
PY - 2017/1/3
Y1 - 2017/1/3
N2 - The glycoproteins (G proteins) of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and related rhabdoviruses (e.g., rabies virus) mediate both cell attachment and membrane fusion. The reversibility of their fusogenic conformational transitions differentiates them from many other low-pH-induced viral fusion proteins. We report single-virion fusion experiments, using methods developed in previous publications to probe fusion of influenza and West Nile viruses. We show that a three-stage model fits VSV single-particle fusion kinetics: (i) reversible, pH-dependent, G-protein conformational change from the known prefusion conformation to an extended, monomeric intermediate; (ii) reversible trimerization and clustering of the G-protein fusion loops, leading to an extended intermediate that inserts the fusion loops into the target-cell membrane; and (iii) folding back of a cluster of extended trimers into their postfusion conformations, bringing together the viral and cellular membranes. From simulations of the kinetic data, we conclude that the critical number of G-protein trimers required to overcome membrane resistance is 3 to 5, within a contact zone between the virus and the target membrane of 30 to 50 trimers. This sequence of conformational events is similar to those shown to describe fusion by influenza virus hemagglutinin (a "class I" fusogen) and West Nile virus envelope protein ("class II"). Our study of VSV now extends this description to "class III" viral fusion proteins, showing that reversibility of the low-pHinduced transition and architectural differences in the fusion proteins themselves do not change the basic mechanism by which they catalyze membrane fusion.
AB - The glycoproteins (G proteins) of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and related rhabdoviruses (e.g., rabies virus) mediate both cell attachment and membrane fusion. The reversibility of their fusogenic conformational transitions differentiates them from many other low-pH-induced viral fusion proteins. We report single-virion fusion experiments, using methods developed in previous publications to probe fusion of influenza and West Nile viruses. We show that a three-stage model fits VSV single-particle fusion kinetics: (i) reversible, pH-dependent, G-protein conformational change from the known prefusion conformation to an extended, monomeric intermediate; (ii) reversible trimerization and clustering of the G-protein fusion loops, leading to an extended intermediate that inserts the fusion loops into the target-cell membrane; and (iii) folding back of a cluster of extended trimers into their postfusion conformations, bringing together the viral and cellular membranes. From simulations of the kinetic data, we conclude that the critical number of G-protein trimers required to overcome membrane resistance is 3 to 5, within a contact zone between the virus and the target membrane of 30 to 50 trimers. This sequence of conformational events is similar to those shown to describe fusion by influenza virus hemagglutinin (a "class I" fusogen) and West Nile virus envelope protein ("class II"). Our study of VSV now extends this description to "class III" viral fusion proteins, showing that reversibility of the low-pHinduced transition and architectural differences in the fusion proteins themselves do not change the basic mechanism by which they catalyze membrane fusion.
KW - Membrane fusion protein|virus entry|enveloped virus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007524030&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1618883114
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1618883114
M3 - Article
C2 - 27974607
AN - SCOPUS:85007524030
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 114
SP - E28-E36
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 1
ER -