Abstract
Methods of measuring nasal obstruction outcomes include both objective anatomic and physiologic measurements, as well as subjective patient-reported measures. Anatomic measurements include acoustic rhinometry, imaging studies, and clinician-derived examination findings. Physiologic measures include rhinomanometry, nasal peak inspiratory flow, and computational fluid dynamics. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-reported assessments of disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes. Several studies attempted correlation of these outcome measures; however, few show strong correlation. Expert opinion favors determining successful surgical outcomes using PROMs. This review provides a summary of current nasal obstruction outcome measures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 883-895 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Functional rhinoplasty
- Nasal obstruction
- Nasal valve stenosis
- Objective and subjective outcomes measures
- Patient-reported outcomes measures