Measuring Nasal Obstruction Outcomes

Emily Spataro, Sam P. Most

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Methods of measuring nasal obstruction outcomes include both objective anatomic and physiologic measurements, as well as subjective patient-reported measures. Anatomic measurements include acoustic rhinometry, imaging studies, and clinician-derived examination findings. Physiologic measures include rhinomanometry, nasal peak inspiratory flow, and computational fluid dynamics. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-reported assessments of disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes. Several studies attempted correlation of these outcome measures; however, few show strong correlation. Expert opinion favors determining successful surgical outcomes using PROMs. This review provides a summary of current nasal obstruction outcome measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-895
Number of pages13
JournalOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Functional rhinoplasty
  • Nasal obstruction
  • Nasal valve stenosis
  • Objective and subjective outcomes measures
  • Patient-reported outcomes measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring Nasal Obstruction Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this