Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research

Cara C. Lewis, Enola K. Proctor, Ross C. Brownson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the CDC, and a number of private foundations have expressed the need for advancing the science of dissemination and implementation. Interest in dissemination and implementation research is present in many countries. Improving health care requires not only effective programs and interventions, but also effective strategies to move them into community based settings of care. But before discrete strategies can be tested for effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, or cost effectiveness, context and outcome constructs must be identified and defined in such a way that enables their manipulation and measurement. Measurement is underdeveloped, with few psychometrically strong measures and very little attention paid to their pragmatic nature. A variety of tools are needed to capture health care access and quality, and no measurement issues are more pressing than those for dissemination and implementation science.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDissemination and Implementation Research in Health
Subtitle of host publicationTranslating Science to Practice, Second Edition
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages229-244
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780190683214
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Keywords

  • Implementation outcomes
  • Measurement
  • Reliability
  • Stakeholder perspectives
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement issues in dissemination and implementation research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this