Matching versus maximizing: Comments on Prelec's paper

  • John H. Kagel
  • , Raymond C. Battalio
  • , Leonard Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

D. Prelec (see record 1982-22589-001) argues that the results obtained under concurrent and single schedules of reinforcement strongly favor the matching interpretation of equilibrium behavior as Ss do not seem to be influenced by the marginal reinforcement rates that define the maximizing behavior distribution. The present authors point out a number of flaws in Prelec's marginality arguments and present data demonstrating the superiority of maximizing over matching as descriptive of choice behavior. (18 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-384
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Review
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1983

Keywords

  • matching vs maximizing, description of choice behavior, criticism of D. Prelec's study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Matching versus maximizing: Comments on Prelec's paper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this