MATCHING AND MAXIMIZING WITH CONCURRENT RATIO‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES

Animals exposed to standard concurrent variable‐ratio variable‐interval schedules could maximize overall reinforcement rate if, in responding, they showed a strong response bias toward the variable‐ratio schedule. Tests with the standard schedules have failed to find such a bias and have been widely cited as evidence against maximization as an explanation of animal choice behavior. However, those experiments were confounded in that the value of leisure (behavior other than the instrumental response) partially offsets the value of reinforcement. The present experiment provides another such test using a concurrent procedure in which the confounding effects of leisure were mostly eliminated while the critical aspects of the concurrent variable‐ratio variable‐interval contingency were maintained: Responding in one component advanced only its ratio schedule while responding in the other component advanced both ratio schedules. The bias toward the latter component predicted by maximization theory was found. 1983 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior