TY - JOUR
T1 - Margin index
T2 - A useful tool for the breast surgeon?
AU - Edwards, Claire
AU - Gao, Feng
AU - Freedman, Gary M.
AU - Margenthaler, Julie A.
AU - Fisher, Carla
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Biostatistics Core , Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA091842 . The authors wish to thank Ms Robin Noel for creating the graphic for Figure 1 . Author contributions: C.E. contributed toward data collection, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. F.G. contributed toward statistical analysis. G.M.F. contributed toward conception and design and critical revision of the manuscript. J.A.M. contributed toward conception and design, analysis and interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript. C.F. contributed toward analysis and interpretation and critical revision of the manuscript.
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Background In breast conservation surgery (BCS) for breast cancer, the appropriate surgical margin is controversial. Margin index, a mathematical relationship between tumor size and closest margin, has been shown to be predictive of the probability of residual cancer after BCS for early stage breast cancer. We applied this tool to the same population of patients at our institution to evaluate its ability to predict residual disease after BCS. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of women undergoing BCS between 1980 and 2010 at the University of Pennsylvania. A total of 246 women underwent re-excision because of close margins. Average margin index between groups with and without residual disease in the re-excision specimen was compared using the Student t-test. A receiver operating curve was created using logistic regression to assess the overall diagnostic ability of the margin index on the presence or absence of residual disease. Results Of patients who underwent re-excision, 29% of patients had residual disease. We analyzed several cutoff values for margin index, but none proved to be significant predictors of residual disease. Average margin index was significantly higher for patients without residual disease compared with patients with residual invasive cancer but not for patients with residual ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusions In women undergoing BCS for early stage breast cancer at our institution, margin index was not predictive of the presence of residual cancer on re-excision. We hypothesize that the predictive ability of a margin index is likely limited by several factors including the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ and the location and extent of the close margin.
AB - Background In breast conservation surgery (BCS) for breast cancer, the appropriate surgical margin is controversial. Margin index, a mathematical relationship between tumor size and closest margin, has been shown to be predictive of the probability of residual cancer after BCS for early stage breast cancer. We applied this tool to the same population of patients at our institution to evaluate its ability to predict residual disease after BCS. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of women undergoing BCS between 1980 and 2010 at the University of Pennsylvania. A total of 246 women underwent re-excision because of close margins. Average margin index between groups with and without residual disease in the re-excision specimen was compared using the Student t-test. A receiver operating curve was created using logistic regression to assess the overall diagnostic ability of the margin index on the presence or absence of residual disease. Results Of patients who underwent re-excision, 29% of patients had residual disease. We analyzed several cutoff values for margin index, but none proved to be significant predictors of residual disease. Average margin index was significantly higher for patients without residual disease compared with patients with residual invasive cancer but not for patients with residual ductal carcinoma in situ. Conclusions In women undergoing BCS for early stage breast cancer at our institution, margin index was not predictive of the presence of residual cancer on re-excision. We hypothesize that the predictive ability of a margin index is likely limited by several factors including the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ and the location and extent of the close margin.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Breast-conserving surgery
KW - Lumpectomy
KW - Radiation therapy
KW - Surgical margins
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902293156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.049
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.049
M3 - Article
C2 - 24746949
AN - SCOPUS:84902293156
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 190
SP - 164
EP - 169
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 1
ER -