TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of Cutibacterium acnes and total shoulder arthroplasty
T2 - has consensus been achieved?
AU - Zmistowski, Benjamin
AU - Koscso, Jonathan
AU - Keener, Jay D.
AU - Burnham, Carey Ann D.
AU - Aleem, Alexander W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infection remains a difficult complication to identify and treat. In efforts to improve provide clarity, a subgroup of the Second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (ICM) generated over 70 recommendations. To understand the current treatment practices and impact of the ICM's work, a survey of shoulder arthroplasty providers was performed. Methods: A 22-question survey, consisting of questions based upon the ICM consensus statement and the clinical experience of these authors, was distributed to all active members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Questions regarded the work-up, diagnosis, and treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection—with specific attention to Cutibacterium acnes. Results: One hundred fifty-nine members completed the survey (16%; 159/990) between August 8 and October 18, 2019. Only two-thirds of respondents reported utilizing the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection proposed by the ICM subgroup. The survey results and associated literature review provided here demonstrate continued discordance regarding the diagnostic work-up and treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Conclusion: It is imperative that the shoulder arthroplasty community adopts a uniform definition for periprosthetic shoulder infection as well as a multispecialty team-based approach to improve patient care and better focus future research. Level of Evidence: Level IV; Survey Study; Case Series
AB - Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infection remains a difficult complication to identify and treat. In efforts to improve provide clarity, a subgroup of the Second International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (ICM) generated over 70 recommendations. To understand the current treatment practices and impact of the ICM's work, a survey of shoulder arthroplasty providers was performed. Methods: A 22-question survey, consisting of questions based upon the ICM consensus statement and the clinical experience of these authors, was distributed to all active members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Questions regarded the work-up, diagnosis, and treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection—with specific attention to Cutibacterium acnes. Results: One hundred fifty-nine members completed the survey (16%; 159/990) between August 8 and October 18, 2019. Only two-thirds of respondents reported utilizing the definition of periprosthetic shoulder infection proposed by the ICM subgroup. The survey results and associated literature review provided here demonstrate continued discordance regarding the diagnostic work-up and treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Conclusion: It is imperative that the shoulder arthroplasty community adopts a uniform definition for periprosthetic shoulder infection as well as a multispecialty team-based approach to improve patient care and better focus future research. Level of Evidence: Level IV; Survey Study; Case Series
KW - Consensus
KW - Infection
KW - International Consensus Meeting
KW - Periprosthetic joint infection
KW - Shoulder
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097094440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.sart.2020.10.006
DO - 10.1053/j.sart.2020.10.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097094440
SN - 1045-4527
VL - 31
SP - 96
EP - 104
JO - Seminars in Arthroplasty
JF - Seminars in Arthroplasty
IS - 1
ER -