TY - JOUR
T1 - Making strides in modeling individual differences
T2 - Reply to leite, ratcliff, and white (2007)
AU - Myerson, Joel
AU - Hale, Sandra
AU - Chen, Jing
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Leite, Ratcliff, and White (2007) claimed that the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) could simulate the molar patterns in response times (RTs) from the multiple tasks observed by Chen, Hale, and Myerson (2007). We present our own simulations to clarify the underlying mechanisms and show that, as is predicted by the difference engine model (Myerson, Hale, Zheng, Jenkins, & Widaman, 2003), correlations across tasks are the key to the molar patterns in individual RTs. Although the diffusion model and other sequential-sampling models may be able to accommodate patterns of RTs across tasks like those studied by Chen et al., the difference engine is the only current model that actually predicts them.
AB - Leite, Ratcliff, and White (2007) claimed that the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) could simulate the molar patterns in response times (RTs) from the multiple tasks observed by Chen, Hale, and Myerson (2007). We present our own simulations to clarify the underlying mechanisms and show that, as is predicted by the difference engine model (Myerson, Hale, Zheng, Jenkins, & Widaman, 2003), correlations across tasks are the key to the molar patterns in individual RTs. Although the diffusion model and other sequential-sampling models may be able to accommodate patterns of RTs across tasks like those studied by Chen et al., the difference engine is the only current model that actually predicts them.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78149440720
U2 - 10.3758/PBR.17.5.756
DO - 10.3758/PBR.17.5.756
M3 - Article
C2 - 21061735
AN - SCOPUS:78149440720
SN - 1069-9384
VL - 17
SP - 756
EP - 762
JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
IS - 5
ER -