TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning predicts risk of cerebrospinal fluid shunt failure in children
T2 - a study from the hydrocephalus clinical research network
AU - Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network
AU - Hale, Andrew T.
AU - Riva-Cambrin, Jay
AU - Wellons, John C.
AU - Jackson, Eric M.
AU - Kestle, John R.W.
AU - Naftel, Robert P.
AU - Hankinson, Todd C.
AU - Shannon, Chevis N.
AU - Kestle, J.
AU - Rozzelle, C.
AU - Drake, J.
AU - Kulkarni, A.
AU - Whitehead, W.
AU - Browd, S.
AU - Simon, T.
AU - Hauptman, J.
AU - Pollack, I.
AU - Limbrick, D.
AU - Wellons, J.
AU - Naftel, R.
AU - Shannon, C.
AU - Tamber, M.
AU - McDonald, P.
AU - Riva-Cambrin, J.
AU - Jackson, E.
AU - Krieger, M.
AU - Chu, J.
AU - Hankinson, T.
AU - Pindrik, J.
AU - Holubkov, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Purpose: While conventional statistical approaches have been used to identify risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt failure, these methods may not fully capture the complex contribution of clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-specific variables influencing this outcome. Using prospectively collected data from the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN) patient registry, we applied machine learning (ML) approaches to create a predictive model of CSF shunt failure. Methods: Pediatric patients (age < 19 years) undergoing first-time CSF shunt placement at six HCRN centers were included. CSF shunt failure was defined as a composite outcome including requirement for shunt revision, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or shunt infection within 5 years of initial surgery. Performance of conventional statistical and 4 ML models were compared. Results: Our cohort consisted of 1036 children undergoing CSF shunt placement, of whom 344 (33.2%) experienced shunt failure. Thirty-eight clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-design variables were included in the ML analyses. Of all ML algorithms tested, the artificial neural network (ANN) had the strongest performance with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.71. The ANN had a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 68%, meaning that the ANN can effectively rule-in patients most likely to experience CSF shunt failure (i.e., high specificity) and moderately effective as a tool to rule-out patients at high risk of CSF shunt failure (i.e., moderately sensitive). The ANN was independently validated in 155 patients (prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed). Conclusion: These data suggest that the ANN, or future iterations thereof, can provide an evidence-based tool to assist in prognostication and patient-counseling immediately after CSF shunt placement.
AB - Purpose: While conventional statistical approaches have been used to identify risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt failure, these methods may not fully capture the complex contribution of clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-specific variables influencing this outcome. Using prospectively collected data from the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN) patient registry, we applied machine learning (ML) approaches to create a predictive model of CSF shunt failure. Methods: Pediatric patients (age < 19 years) undergoing first-time CSF shunt placement at six HCRN centers were included. CSF shunt failure was defined as a composite outcome including requirement for shunt revision, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or shunt infection within 5 years of initial surgery. Performance of conventional statistical and 4 ML models were compared. Results: Our cohort consisted of 1036 children undergoing CSF shunt placement, of whom 344 (33.2%) experienced shunt failure. Thirty-eight clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-design variables were included in the ML analyses. Of all ML algorithms tested, the artificial neural network (ANN) had the strongest performance with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.71. The ANN had a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 68%, meaning that the ANN can effectively rule-in patients most likely to experience CSF shunt failure (i.e., high specificity) and moderately effective as a tool to rule-out patients at high risk of CSF shunt failure (i.e., moderately sensitive). The ANN was independently validated in 155 patients (prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed). Conclusion: These data suggest that the ANN, or future iterations thereof, can provide an evidence-based tool to assist in prognostication and patient-counseling immediately after CSF shunt placement.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - CSF shunt failure
KW - HCRN
KW - Hydrocephalus
KW - Machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105896071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00381-021-05061-7
DO - 10.1007/s00381-021-05061-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33515058
AN - SCOPUS:85105896071
SN - 0256-7040
VL - 37
SP - 1485
EP - 1494
JO - Child's Nervous System
JF - Child's Nervous System
IS - 5
ER -