Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: A meta-analysis

Maria A. Pereda, Miguel A. Chavez, Catherine C. Hooper-Miele, Robert H. Gilman, Mark C. Steinhoff, Laura E. Ellington, Margaret Gross, Carrie Price, James M. Tielsch, William Checkley

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

329 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pneumonia is the leading cause of death of children. Diagnostic tools include chest radiography, but guidelines do not currently recommend the use of lung ultrasound (LUS) as a diagnostic method. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of LUS for childhood pneumonia. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Global Health, World Health Organization-Libraries, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature of studies comparing LUS diagnostic accuracy against a reference standard. We used a combination of controlled key words for age <18 years, pneumonia, and ultrasound. We identified 1475 studies and selected 15 (1%) for further review. Eight studies (765 children) were retrieved for analysis, of which 6 (75%) were conducted in the general pediatric population and 2 (25%) in neonates. Eligible studies provided information to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Heterogeneity was assessed by using Q and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Five studies (63%) reported using highly skilled sonographers. Overall methodologic quality was high, but heterogeneity was observed across studies. LUS had a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94%-97%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI: 90%-96%), and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 15.3 (95% CI: 6.6-35.3) and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03-0.11), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98. Limitations included the following: most studies included in our analysis had a low number of patients, and the number of eligible studies was also small. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports LUS as an imaging alternative for the diagnosis of childhood pneumonia. Recommendations to train pediatricians on LUS for diagnosis of pneumonia may have important implications in different clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)714-722
Number of pages9
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this