TY - JOUR
T1 - Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge in Four Internal Medicine Programs
AU - Urrutia Argueta, Samuel
AU - Basnet, Nishraj
AU - Abdul-Kafi, Owais
AU - Hanna, Nasser
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Introduction: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Low density CT (LDCT) has been shown to reduce mortality in high-risk populations. Recognizing and mitigating gaps in knowledge in early medical training could result in increased utilization of screening CT in high risk-populations. Methods: An electronic survey was conducted among Internal Medicine (IM) residents at 4 academic programs in the Midwestern United States. A survey was distributed to evaluate knowledge about high-risk populations, mortality benefits, and a comparison in mortality benefits between LDCT and other screening modalities using number needed to screen (NNS). Results: There was a 46.6% (166/360) response rate. Residents correctly answered an average of 2.9/7 (43.1%) questions. PGY-1 (post-graduate year) and PGY-2 residents performed better than PGY-3 (P =.022). Only 1/3 rd of all respondents correctly identified the population needed to be screened. Over 80% of residents thought screening with LDCT had a cancer-specific mortality benefit but were evenly split (except Program 2 residents), on recognizing an all-cause mortality benefit with LDCT, (P =.016). Only 7.7% thought women benefited the most from LDCT. Self-assess and attained knowledge were similar among programs. Conclusions: LDCT is a noninvasive intervention with a substantial mortality reduction, especially in states with high rates of smoking, and is widely covered by insurers. With average knowledge score less than 50%, this study shows there is a substantial need to increase the knowledge of LCS in IM residency programs.
AB - Introduction: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Low density CT (LDCT) has been shown to reduce mortality in high-risk populations. Recognizing and mitigating gaps in knowledge in early medical training could result in increased utilization of screening CT in high risk-populations. Methods: An electronic survey was conducted among Internal Medicine (IM) residents at 4 academic programs in the Midwestern United States. A survey was distributed to evaluate knowledge about high-risk populations, mortality benefits, and a comparison in mortality benefits between LDCT and other screening modalities using number needed to screen (NNS). Results: There was a 46.6% (166/360) response rate. Residents correctly answered an average of 2.9/7 (43.1%) questions. PGY-1 (post-graduate year) and PGY-2 residents performed better than PGY-3 (P =.022). Only 1/3 rd of all respondents correctly identified the population needed to be screened. Over 80% of residents thought screening with LDCT had a cancer-specific mortality benefit but were evenly split (except Program 2 residents), on recognizing an all-cause mortality benefit with LDCT, (P =.016). Only 7.7% thought women benefited the most from LDCT. Self-assess and attained knowledge were similar among programs. Conclusions: LDCT is a noninvasive intervention with a substantial mortality reduction, especially in states with high rates of smoking, and is widely covered by insurers. With average knowledge score less than 50%, this study shows there is a substantial need to increase the knowledge of LCS in IM residency programs.
KW - graduate medical education
KW - knowledge
KW - lung cancer
KW - lung cancer screening
KW - primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145026973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10732748221081383
DO - 10.1177/10732748221081383
M3 - Article
C2 - 36895164
AN - SCOPUS:85145026973
SN - 1073-2748
VL - 29
JO - Cancer Control
JF - Cancer Control
ER -