Low RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathologic complete response absence in patients with breast cancer

Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Thierry Petit, Joke Tio, Daniele Generali, Eva M. Ciruelos, Nadia Califaretti, Brigitte Poirier, Antonio Ardizzoia, Arnd Hoenig Med, Benno Lex Med, Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier, Dagmar Giesecke Med, Nicolas Isambert, Ricardo Masetti, Lacey Pitre, Denise Wrobel Med, Paule Augereau, Manuela Milani, Sara RaskChristine Solbach Med, Laura Pritzker, Sanaa Noubir, Amadeo Parissenti, Maureen E. Trudeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In previously reported retrospective studies, high tumor RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicted for post-treatment pathologic complete response (pCR) and improved disease-free survival at definitive surgery for primary early breast cancer. The BREVITY (Breast Cancer Response Evaluation for Individualized Therapy) prospective clinical trial (NCT03524430) seeks to validate these prior findings. Here we report training set (Phase I) findings, including determination of RNA disruption index (RDI) cut points for outcome prediction in the subsequent validation set (Phase II; 454 patients). In 80 patients of the training set, maximum tumor RDI values for biopsies obtained during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly higher in pCR responders than in patients without pCR post-treatment (P ¼ .008). Moreover, maximum tumor RDI values ≤3.7 during treatment predicted for a lack of pCR at surgery (negative predictive value ¼ 93.3%). These findings support the prospect that on-treatment tumor RNA disruption assessments may effectively predict post-surgery outcome, possibly permitting treatment optimization.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpkad107
JournalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathologic complete response absence in patients with breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this