Abstract

Advances in MRI technology have led to the development of low-field-strength (hereafter, “low-field”) (0.55 T) MRI systems with lower weight, fewer shielding requirements, and lower cost than those of traditional (1.5–3 T) systems. The trade-offs of lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.55 T are partially offset by patient safety and potential comfort advantages (eg, lower specific absorption rate and a more cost-effective larger bore diameter) and physical advantages (eg, decreased T2* decay, shorter T1 relaxation times). Image reconstruction advances leveraging developing technologies (such as deep learning–based denoising) can be paired with traditional techniques (such as increasing the number of signal averages) to improve SNR. The overall image quality produced by low-field MRI systems, although perhaps somewhat inferior to 1.5–3 T MRI systems in terms of SNR, is nevertheless diagnostic for a broad variety of body imaging applications. Effective low-field body MRI requires (a) an understanding of the trade-offs resulting from lower field strengths, (b) an approach to modifying routine sequences to overcome SNR challenges, and (c) a workflow for carefully selecting appropriate patients. The authors describe the rationale, opportunities, and challenges of low-field body MRI; discuss important considerations for low-field imaging with common body MRI sequences; and delineate a variety of use cases for low-field body MRI. The authors also include lessons learned from their preliminary experience with a new low-field MRI system at a tertiary care center. Finally, they explore the future of low-field MRI, summarizing current limitations and potential future developments that may enhance the clinical adoption of this technology.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere230073
JournalRadiographics
Volume43
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low-Field-Strength Body MRI: Challenges and Opportunities at 0.55 T'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this