Abstract
In North America mound research traditionally focuses on how these earthen structures functioned -- as mortuary facilities, ceremonial platforms, observatories, and the residences of political elites and/or ritual practitioners. This paper acknowledges mound building as the purposeful selection of soils and sediments for specific color, texture, or engineering properties and the organization of deposits suggesting that the building process reflects both shared knowledge and communicates specific information. We present two examples: Late Archaic period Poverty Point site Mound A, and Mississippian period Shiloh site Mound A, in the exploration of structured deposits to identify ritual in contrast to a more mundane or purely practical origin. We argue the building of these earthen monuments was not only architecturally important as a means to serve a subsequent purpose but that the act of construction itself was a ritual process intended to serve its own religious and social purposes. In these contexts, ritual does much more than communicate underlying social relationships; it is instrumental to their production.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1077-1099 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Earthen mounds
- Geoarchaeology
- Ritual
- Southeastern US