TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the United States
T2 - An Updated Analysis of a Single Institution's Experience
AU - Zuke, William A.
AU - Hannon, Charles P.
AU - Salih, Rondek
AU - Kromka, Joseph
AU - Granger, Caroline
AU - Clohisy, John C.
AU - Barrack, Robert L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 THE AUTHORS. PUBLISHED BY THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, INCORPORATED.
PY - 2025/3/19
Y1 - 2025/3/19
N2 - Background:We previously reported the 5-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant. This study evaluates BHR survivorship as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.Methods:A total of 224 patients with contemporary indications, including 179 patients from the original study, were included in this analysis. Survivorship was calculated. Metal ion levels and radiographs were updated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with those for matched patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The mean follow-up was 14 years.Results:Survivorship free from any revision and from aseptic revision was 96.0% and 97.4% at 15 years, respectively. Two patients had undergone revision since the original study. The median serum cobalt and chromium levels were 1.4 and 1.5 ppb, respectively. The PROs were similar to those for the THA cohort. Equal proportions of patients remained active; however, the BHR group trended toward more remaining highly active (p = 0.12).Conclusions:Although activity was similar to THA at long-term follow-up, the BHR implant remains an excellent option for the treatment of osteoarthritis in younger male patients.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - Background:We previously reported the 5-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant. This study evaluates BHR survivorship as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.Methods:A total of 224 patients with contemporary indications, including 179 patients from the original study, were included in this analysis. Survivorship was calculated. Metal ion levels and radiographs were updated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with those for matched patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The mean follow-up was 14 years.Results:Survivorship free from any revision and from aseptic revision was 96.0% and 97.4% at 15 years, respectively. Two patients had undergone revision since the original study. The median serum cobalt and chromium levels were 1.4 and 1.5 ppb, respectively. The PROs were similar to those for the THA cohort. Equal proportions of patients remained active; however, the BHR group trended toward more remaining highly active (p = 0.12).Conclusions:Although activity was similar to THA at long-term follow-up, the BHR implant remains an excellent option for the treatment of osteoarthritis in younger male patients.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217485022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.24.00926
DO - 10.2106/JBJS.24.00926
M3 - Article
C2 - 39908356
AN - SCOPUS:85217485022
SN - 0021-9355
VL - 107
JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
IS - 6
M1 - e19
ER -