Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation registry: Comparison with the randomized trial

Frederick Feit, Maria Mori Brooks, George Sopko, Norma M. Keller, Allan Rosen, Ronald Krone, Peter B. Berger, Richard Shemin, Michael J. Attubato, David O. Williams, Robert Frye, Katherine M. Detre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

167 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background - The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) included 4039 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease; 1829 consented to randomization, and 2010 did not but were followed up in a registry. Thus, we can evaluate the outcome of physician-guided versus random assignment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Methods and Results -We compared the baseline features and outcomes for PTCA and CABG in the overall registry and its predesignated subgroups. We assessed the impact of treatment by choice versus random assignment by comparing the results in the registry with those of the randomized trial. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made. Within the registry, nearly twice as many patients were selected for PTCA (1189) as CABG (625); mortality at 7 years was similar for PTCA (13.9%) and CABG (14.2%) (P = 0.66) before and after adjustment for baseline differences between patients selected for PTCA versus CABG (adjusted RR, 1.02; P = 0.86). In contrast to the randomized trial, the 7-year mortality rate of treated diabetics in the registry was equally high (26%) with PTCA or CABG. Seven-year mortality was higher for patients undergoing PTCA in the randomized trial than in the registry (19.1% versus 13.9%, P < 0.01) but not for those undergoing CABG (15.6% versus 14.2%, P = 0.57). The adjusted relative mortality risk for PTCA in the randomized versus registry population was 1.17 (P = 0.16). Conclusions - BARI physicians were able to select PTCA rather than CABG for 65% of registry patients who underwent revascularization without compromising long-term survival either in the overall population or in treated diabetics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2795-2802
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation
Volume101
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 20 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Bypass
  • Coronary disease
  • Revascularization

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation registry: Comparison with the randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Feit, F., Brooks, M. M., Sopko, G., Keller, N. M., Rosen, A., Krone, R., Berger, P. B., Shemin, R., Attubato, M. J., Williams, D. O., Frye, R., & Detre, K. M. (2000). Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation registry: Comparison with the randomized trial. Circulation, 101(24), 2795-2802. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.24.2795