TY - JOUR
T1 - Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
T2 - a real-world analysis from 21 US centers
AU - Zelikson, Viktoriya
AU - Gurumurthi, Ashwath
AU - Sawalha, Yazeed
AU - Annunzio, Kaitlin
AU - Saha, Aditi
AU - Dong, Ning
AU - Qualls, David
AU - Amoozgar, Behzad
AU - Kahl, Brad
AU - Baird, John
AU - Challa, Pavan
AU - Huntington, Scott F.
AU - Santos, Jennifer
AU - Bair, Steven
AU - Narkhede, Mayur
AU - Li, Shuning
AU - Frosch, Zachary
AU - Ho, Carrie
AU - Smith, Stephen D.
AU - Winter, Allison
AU - Landsburg, Daniel
AU - Furqan, Fateeha
AU - Hamadani, Mehdi
AU - Baird, Katelin
AU - Romancik, Jason
AU - Alharthy, Hanan
AU - Law, Jennie
AU - Bojanini, Leyla
AU - Advani, Ranjana
AU - Hu, Boyu
AU - Johnson, Patrick Connor
AU - Grover, Natalie S.
AU - Merril, Mwanasha
AU - Crombie, Jennifer L.
AU - Shafagati, Nazila
AU - Sterling, Cole
AU - Nastoupil, Loretta J.
AU - Epperla, Narendranath
AU - Ayers, Emily C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2025 Ferrata Storti Foundation.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.
AB - Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000179000
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2024.285977
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2024.285977
M3 - Article
C2 - 39540227
AN - SCOPUS:86000179000
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 110
SP - 706
EP - 714
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 3
ER -