TY - JOUR
T1 - Leveraging remotely sensed non-wall-to-wall data for wall-to-wall upscaling in forest inventory
AU - Chen, Fangting
AU - Hou, Zhengyang
AU - Saarela, Svetlana
AU - McRoberts, Ronald E.
AU - Ståhl, Göran
AU - Kangas, Annika
AU - Packalen, Petteri
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Xu, Qing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Remote sensing (RS) has enhanced forest inventory with model-based inference, that is, a family of statistical procedures rigorously estimates the parameter of a variable of interest (VOI) for a spatial population, e.g., the mean or total of forest carbon for a study area. Upscaling in earth observation, alias to this estimation, aggregates VOI from a finer spatial resolution to a coarser one with reduced uncertainty, serving decision making for natural resource management at larger scales. However, conventional model-based estimation (CMB) confronts a major challenge: it only supports RS wall-to-wall data, meaning that remotely sensed data must be available in panorama and non-wall-to-wall but quality data such as lidar or even cloud-masked satellite imagery are not supported due to incomplete coverage, impeding precise upscaling with cutting-edge instruments or for large scale applications. Consequently, this study aims to develop and demonstrate the use and usefulness of RS non-wall-to-wall data for upscaling with Hierarchical model-based estimation (HMB) which incorporates a two-stage model for bridging RS non– and wall-to-wall data; and for optimizing cost-efficiency, to evaluate the effects of non-wall-to-wall sample size on upscaling precision. Three main conclusions are relevant: (1) the HMB is a variant of the CMB estimator through trading in the uncertainty of the second-stage model to enable estimation using RS non-wall-to-wall data; (2) a quality first-stage model is key to exerting the advantage of HMB relative to the CMB estimator; (3) the variance of the HMB estimator is dominated by the first-stage model variance component, indicating that increasing the sample size in the first-stage is effective for increasing the overall precision. Overall, the HMB estimator balances tradeoffs between cost, efficiency and flexibility when devising a model-based upscaling in earth observation.
AB - Remote sensing (RS) has enhanced forest inventory with model-based inference, that is, a family of statistical procedures rigorously estimates the parameter of a variable of interest (VOI) for a spatial population, e.g., the mean or total of forest carbon for a study area. Upscaling in earth observation, alias to this estimation, aggregates VOI from a finer spatial resolution to a coarser one with reduced uncertainty, serving decision making for natural resource management at larger scales. However, conventional model-based estimation (CMB) confronts a major challenge: it only supports RS wall-to-wall data, meaning that remotely sensed data must be available in panorama and non-wall-to-wall but quality data such as lidar or even cloud-masked satellite imagery are not supported due to incomplete coverage, impeding precise upscaling with cutting-edge instruments or for large scale applications. Consequently, this study aims to develop and demonstrate the use and usefulness of RS non-wall-to-wall data for upscaling with Hierarchical model-based estimation (HMB) which incorporates a two-stage model for bridging RS non– and wall-to-wall data; and for optimizing cost-efficiency, to evaluate the effects of non-wall-to-wall sample size on upscaling precision. Three main conclusions are relevant: (1) the HMB is a variant of the CMB estimator through trading in the uncertainty of the second-stage model to enable estimation using RS non-wall-to-wall data; (2) a quality first-stage model is key to exerting the advantage of HMB relative to the CMB estimator; (3) the variance of the HMB estimator is dominated by the first-stage model variance component, indicating that increasing the sample size in the first-stage is effective for increasing the overall precision. Overall, the HMB estimator balances tradeoffs between cost, efficiency and flexibility when devising a model-based upscaling in earth observation.
KW - Model-based inference
KW - Non-wall-to-wall
KW - Survey sampling
KW - Two-stage modeling
KW - Wall-to-wall
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153064320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103314
DO - 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103314
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85153064320
SN - 1569-8432
VL - 119
JO - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
JF - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
M1 - 103314
ER -