TY - JOUR
T1 - Lessons in Digital Epidemiology from COTS-1
T2 - Coordinating Multicentre Research across 10 Countries Using Operational and Technology Innovation to Overcome Funding Deficiencies
AU - the Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) Group
AU - Gunasekeran, Dinesh Visva
AU - Agrawal, Rupesh
AU - Testi, Ilaria
AU - Agarwal, Aniruddha
AU - Mahajan, Sarakshi
AU - Nguyen, Quan Dong
AU - Pavesio, Carlos
AU - Gupta, Vishali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: There is controversy regarding the diagnosis and management of ocular tuberculosis (TB) due to lack of robust evidence. The Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) was conducted in stages to enable swift, accurate data collection across 25 participating centers. Method: Data collection was facilitated by a cloud-based data aggregation platform with programmed logic based on anecdotal evidence from uveitis experts corroborated with literature review. Results: The platform enabled standardization of interpretation and collection of data from patient medical records. The pre-programmed logic also ensured the platform only prompted the entry of relevant data based on initial data entered for each unit of analysis. This enabled collection of the vast amounts of data without compromising either of the breadth nor the depth of data collection. Conclusion: The final output from this effort was an in-depth retrospective analysis to facilitate the design of future prospective investigations on ocular TB and develop best practice guidelines.
AB - Purpose: There is controversy regarding the diagnosis and management of ocular tuberculosis (TB) due to lack of robust evidence. The Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS) was conducted in stages to enable swift, accurate data collection across 25 participating centers. Method: Data collection was facilitated by a cloud-based data aggregation platform with programmed logic based on anecdotal evidence from uveitis experts corroborated with literature review. Results: The platform enabled standardization of interpretation and collection of data from patient medical records. The pre-programmed logic also ensured the platform only prompted the entry of relevant data based on initial data entered for each unit of analysis. This enabled collection of the vast amounts of data without compromising either of the breadth nor the depth of data collection. Conclusion: The final output from this effort was an in-depth retrospective analysis to facilitate the design of future prospective investigations on ocular TB and develop best practice guidelines.
KW - Clinical research
KW - Collaborative Ocular Tuberculosis Study (COTS)
KW - methodology
KW - multi-center investigation
KW - ocular tuberculosis
KW - tuberculosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084129855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09273948.2020.1744669
DO - 10.1080/09273948.2020.1744669
M3 - Article
C2 - 32320326
AN - SCOPUS:85084129855
SN - 0927-3948
VL - 28
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Ocular Immunology and Inflammation
JF - Ocular Immunology and Inflammation
IS - sup1
ER -