Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States

  • Michelle R. Ellefson
  • , Rebecca Treiman
  • , Brett Kessler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Learning about letters is an important foundation for literacy development. Should children be taught to label letters by conventional names, such as /bi/ for b, or by sounds, such as /be{schwa}/? We queried parents and teachers, finding that those in the United States stress letter names with young children, whereas those in England begin with sounds. Looking at 5- to 7-year-olds in the two countries, we found that U.S. children were better at providing the names of letters than were English children. English children outperformed U.S. children on letter-sound tasks, and differences between children in the two countries declined with age. We further found that children use the first-learned set of labels to inform the learning of the second set. As a result, English and U.S. children made different types of errors in letter-name and letter-sound tasks. The children's invented spellings also differed in ways reflecting the labels they used for letters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-341
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume102
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Keywords

  • Learning letters
  • Literacy
  • Spelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this