Learning Environment is the Prevailing Factor in Surgical Residents’ Favorite Rotations

Objective: Understand the characteristics of residents’ favorite rotations to improve the ability of educators to maximize positive learning experiences. Design: Novel cross-sectional survey developed through thematic analysis of focus groups with residents using 4-point Likert scales ranked from “Not at all important” to “Extremely important.” Setting: Single university-affiliated urban hospital Participants: Clinical surgical residents Background: Resident assessments of learning experiences vary between rotations leading to the development of “favorite” rotations. Materials and Methods: A novel survey instrument containing 31 characteristics divided into 4 thematic categories was developed following analysis of surgical resident focus groups. Clinical surgical residents were asked how important each characteristic was for determining their favorite rotation on a 4-point Likert Scale from “not at all important” to “extremely important.” Two-sided independent sample T-tests were used. Results: The response rate was 59% (33/56) with proportional representation of postgraduate levels. Overall, 67% (22/33) of residents reported their favorite rotation was in their preferred specialty, 70% (23/33) reported their favorite rotation required >70 hours per week in the hospital, and 97% (32/33) of residents reported their favorite rotation required <2 days of clinic. Overall, the average ranking of the categories from most to least important was content (mean = 2.84, SD = 0.48), learning environment (mean = 2.67, SD = 0.57), working environment (mean = 2.38, SD = 0.56), and accomplishment (mean = 2.31, SD = 0.57). The only category with a statistically significant difference between junior and senior resident was content with seniors ranking it most important (mean = 3.35, SD = 0.93) compared to junior residents who ranked it least important (mean = 2.21, SD = 1.25), p = 0.01. Personal characteristics such as “Attendings cared about my learning” (mean = 3.56, SD = 0.50) and “I felt good at my job” (mean = 3.45, SD = 0.67), tended to be more important than structural characteristics such as “call schedule” (mean = 2.71, SD = 0.86), “formal didactics” (mean = 2.67, SD = 1.04), and “work-life balance” (mean = 2.70, SD = 0.99). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a novel understanding of the factors that contribute to resident preferences for certain rotations. Junior and senior residents attribute importance differently, which may provide the basis for level-appropriate improvements. Personal factors tended to be more contributory than structural factors, highlighting additional dimensions to examine when considering how to optimize certain rotations.