Abstract
Background: This study provides an example for evaluating learning curve when introducing a new knee system. Methods: Thirty-five investigators across 22 sites prospectively implanted 843 subjects with currently available products (group A). Seventy-seven investigators across 48 sites prospectively implanted 2330 subjects with the ATTUNE Knee System; in which the first 10 subjects for each surgeon were the learning curve cases (group B, N = 611), and the later subjects were designated as group C (N = 1719). Surgical time, rates of intraoperative and early postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a minimum of 1 year were compared. Results: Mean (standard deviation) surgical time was 72.0 (21.6) minutes for group A, 83.0 (24.2) for group B, and 72.1 (24.1) for group C (P <.001 for group B vs group C; P =.955 for group C vs group A). Intraoperative, early (<90 day) complication rates, and PROMs were similar for all groups. Conclusions: The new knee system learning curve was characterized by a slightly longer surgical time with no negative impact on complications or PROMs. Level of Evidence: III.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 348-353 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Arthroplasty Today |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2018 |
Keywords
- ATTUNE
- Adverse events
- Clinical outcomes
- Learning curve
- Total knee arthroplasty