TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning-based image reconstruction via parallel proximal algorithm
AU - Bostan, Emrah
AU - Kamilov, Ulugbek S.
AU - Waller, Laura
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1994-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - In the past decade, sparsity-driven regularization has led to the advancement of image reconstruction algorithms. Traditionally, such regularizers rely on analytical models of sparsity [e.g., total variation (TV)]. However, more recent methods are increasingly centered around data-driven arguments inspired by deep learning. In this letter, we propose to generalize TV regularization by replacing the ℓ1-penalty with an alternative prior that is trainable. Specifically, our method learns the prior via extending the recently proposed fast parallel proximal algorithm to incorporate data-adaptive proximal operators. The proposed framework does not require additional inner iterations for evaluating the proximal mappings of the corresponding learned prior. Moreover, our formalism ensures that the training and reconstruction processes share the same algorithmic structure, making the end-to-end implementation intuitive. As an example, we demonstrate our algorithm on the problem of deconvolution in a fluorescence microscope.
AB - In the past decade, sparsity-driven regularization has led to the advancement of image reconstruction algorithms. Traditionally, such regularizers rely on analytical models of sparsity [e.g., total variation (TV)]. However, more recent methods are increasingly centered around data-driven arguments inspired by deep learning. In this letter, we propose to generalize TV regularization by replacing the ℓ1-penalty with an alternative prior that is trainable. Specifically, our method learns the prior via extending the recently proposed fast parallel proximal algorithm to incorporate data-adaptive proximal operators. The proposed framework does not require additional inner iterations for evaluating the proximal mappings of the corresponding learned prior. Moreover, our formalism ensures that the training and reconstruction processes share the same algorithmic structure, making the end-to-end implementation intuitive. As an example, we demonstrate our algorithm on the problem of deconvolution in a fluorescence microscope.
KW - Image reconstruction
KW - inverse problems
KW - iterative shrinkage
KW - learning
KW - statistical modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046453779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/LSP.2018.2833812
DO - 10.1109/LSP.2018.2833812
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85046453779
SN - 1070-9908
VL - 25
SP - 989
EP - 993
JO - IEEE Signal Processing Letters
JF - IEEE Signal Processing Letters
IS - 7
ER -