TY - JOUR
T1 - Lack of clinically relevant differences in safety and pharmacokinetics after second-dose administration of intranasal diazepam within 4 h for acute treatment of seizure clusters
T2 - A population analysis
AU - for the DIAZ.001.05 Study Group
AU - Cascino, Gregory D.
AU - Tarquinio, Daniel
AU - Wheless, James W.
AU - Hogan, Robert Edward
AU - Sperling, Michael R.
AU - Desai, Jay
AU - Vazquez, Blanca
AU - Samara, Emil
AU - Misra, Sunita N.
AU - Carrazana, Enrique
AU - Rabinowicz, Adrian L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Medical writing support was provided at the direction of the authors by W. Todd Penberthy, PhD, and by Kirk Evanson, PhD, of The Curry Rockefeller Group, LLC (Tarrytown, NY), which also provided additional editorial assistance including formatting and proofreading, and was funded by Neurelis, Inc. (San Diego, CA).
Funding Information:
G.D.C. has nothing to disclose. D.T. has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Avexis, Marinus, and Neurelis. J.W.W. has served as an advisor or consultant for CombiMatrix, Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Neurelis, NeuroPace, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, and Upsher‐Smith Laboratories. J.W.W. has served as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for Cyberonics, Eisai, Lundbeck, Mallinckrodt, Neurelis, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, and Upsher‐Smith Laboratories, and has received grants for clinical research from Acorda Therapeutics, GW Pharmaceuticals, Insys Therapeutics, Lundbeck, Mallinckrodt, Neurelis, NeuroPace, Upsher‐Smith Laboratories, and Zogenix. R.E.H. has received research support from UCB Pharmaceuticals, Neurelis, and Biogen, and is an advisor for Neurelis. M.R.S. has received compensation for speaking at CME programs from Medscape, Projects for Knowledge, International Medical Press, Eisai, and UCB Pharma. He is an advisor for scientific publications for Neurelis. He consults for Medtronic with payments to Thomas Jefferson University. He has received research support from Eisai, Medtronic, Neurelis, SK Life Science, Takeda, Xenon, Cerevel, UCB Pharma, and Engage Pharmaceuticals. He has received royalties from Oxford University Press. J.D. has received research funding from Neurelis, Aquestive, Ovid, Novartis, and UCB. B.V. is an advisor to Neurelis. E.S. is a consultant for Neurelis. E.C. is an employee of and has received stock and stock options from Neurelis. A.L.R. and S.N.M. are employees of and have received stock options from Neurelis. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: Current diazepam nasal spray labeling requires waiting 4 h before administering a second dose. The objective of the current analyses was to examine safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of second doses of diazepam nasal spray given 0−4 h after the first dose. Methods: Two datasets were analyzed. The first, a long-term, repeat-dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray, compared rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and treatment-related TEAEs for patients receiving ≥1 second dose ≤4 h versus all second doses >4 h after the first. The second was a population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from three phase 1 studies to model drug exposure when a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered across multiple time points (1 min−4 h) following the first dose. Results: In the repeat-dose safety study, a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered ≤24 h after the first to treat 485 seizure clusters in 79 patients. Rates of TEAEs were similar between patients receiving ≥1 second dose in ≤4 h (89.5%, n = 38) compared with >4–24 h only (80.5%, n = 41). The most common treatment-related TEAEs were associated with nasal discomfort, which was mild or moderate and transient. There were no reports of respiratory or cardiac depression. The pharmacokinetic simulations of second doses predicted comparable elevations of plasma diazepam concentrations with administrations across a range of intervals after the first dose (1 min−4 h). Significance: These data indicate that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of a second dose of diazepam nasal spray administered within 4 h of the first dose are consistent with those associated with current labeling. This is potentially important for patients with seizure clusters who have a recurrent seizure within 4 h of first treatment and might benefit from immediate retreatment to reduce the risk of progression to status epilepticus.
AB - Objective: Current diazepam nasal spray labeling requires waiting 4 h before administering a second dose. The objective of the current analyses was to examine safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of second doses of diazepam nasal spray given 0−4 h after the first dose. Methods: Two datasets were analyzed. The first, a long-term, repeat-dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray, compared rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and treatment-related TEAEs for patients receiving ≥1 second dose ≤4 h versus all second doses >4 h after the first. The second was a population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from three phase 1 studies to model drug exposure when a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered across multiple time points (1 min−4 h) following the first dose. Results: In the repeat-dose safety study, a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered ≤24 h after the first to treat 485 seizure clusters in 79 patients. Rates of TEAEs were similar between patients receiving ≥1 second dose in ≤4 h (89.5%, n = 38) compared with >4–24 h only (80.5%, n = 41). The most common treatment-related TEAEs were associated with nasal discomfort, which was mild or moderate and transient. There were no reports of respiratory or cardiac depression. The pharmacokinetic simulations of second doses predicted comparable elevations of plasma diazepam concentrations with administrations across a range of intervals after the first dose (1 min−4 h). Significance: These data indicate that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of a second dose of diazepam nasal spray administered within 4 h of the first dose are consistent with those associated with current labeling. This is potentially important for patients with seizure clusters who have a recurrent seizure within 4 h of first treatment and might benefit from immediate retreatment to reduce the risk of progression to status epilepticus.
KW - acute repetitive seizure
KW - benzodiazepine
KW - nasal spray
KW - seizure emergency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128437870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/epi.17249
DO - 10.1111/epi.17249
M3 - Article
C2 - 35377464
AN - SCOPUS:85128437870
SN - 0013-9580
VL - 63
SP - 1714
EP - 1723
JO - Epilepsia
JF - Epilepsia
IS - 7
ER -