Abstract
Many approaches to identify therapeutically relevant neoantigens couple tumor sequencing with bioinformatic algorithms and inferred rules of tumor epitope immunogenicity. However, there are no reference data to compare these approaches, and the parameters governing tumor epitope immunogenicity remain unclear. Here, we assembled a global consortium wherein each participant predicted immunogenic epitopes from shared tumor sequencing data. 608 epitopes were subsequently assessed for T cell binding in patient-matched samples. By integrating peptide features associated with presentation and recognition, we developed a model of tumor epitope immunogenicity that filtered out 98% of non-immunogenic peptides with a precision above 0.70. Pipelines prioritizing model features had superior performance, and pipeline alterations leveraging them improved prediction performance. These findings were validated in an independent cohort of 310 epitopes prioritized from tumor sequencing data and assessed for T cell binding. This data resource enables identification of parameters underlying effective anti-tumor immunity and is available to the research community. Genomic tumor sequencing data with matched measurements of tumor epitope immunogenicity allows for insights into the governing parameters of epitope immunogenicity and generation of models for effective neoantigen prediction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 818-834.e13 |
Journal | Cell |
Volume | 183 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 29 2020 |
Keywords
- TESLA
- epitope
- immunogenicity
- immunogenomics
- immunotherapy
- neoantigen
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Key Parameters of Tumor Epitope Immunogenicity Revealed Through a Consortium Approach Improve Neoantigen Prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Key Parameters of Tumor Epitope Immunogenicity Revealed Through a Consortium Approach Improve Neoantigen Prediction. / The Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance.
In: Cell, Vol. 183, No. 3, 29.10.2020, p. 818-834.e13.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Key Parameters of Tumor Epitope Immunogenicity Revealed Through a Consortium Approach Improve Neoantigen Prediction
AU - The Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance
AU - Wells, Daniel K.
AU - van Buuren, Marit M.
AU - Dang, Kristen K.
AU - Hubbard-Lucey, Vanessa M.
AU - Sheehan, Kathleen C.F.
AU - Campbell, Katie M.
AU - Lamb, Andrew
AU - Ward, Jeffrey P.
AU - Sidney, John
AU - Blazquez, Ana B.
AU - Rech, Andrew J.
AU - Zaretsky, Jesse M.
AU - Comin-Anduix, Begonya
AU - Ng, Alphonsus H.C.
AU - Chour, William
AU - Yu, Thomas V.
AU - Rizvi, Hira
AU - Chen, Jia M.
AU - Manning, Patrice
AU - Steiner, Gabriela M.
AU - Doan, Xengie C.
AU - Khan, Aly A.
AU - Lugade, Amit
AU - Lazic, Ana M.Mijalkovic
AU - Frentzen, Angela A.Elizabeth
AU - Tadmor, Arbel D.
AU - Sasson, Ariella S.
AU - Rao, Arjun A.
AU - Pei, Baikang
AU - Schrörs, Barbara
AU - Berent-Maoz, Beata
AU - Carreno, Beatriz M.
AU - Song, Bin
AU - Peters, Bjoern
AU - Li, Bo
AU - Higgs, Brandon W.
AU - Stevenson, Brian J.
AU - Iseli, Christian
AU - Miller, Christopher A.
AU - Morehouse, Christopher A.
AU - Melief, Cornelis J.M.
AU - Puig-Saus, Cristina
AU - van Beek, Daphne
AU - Balli, David
AU - Gfeller, David
AU - Haussler, David
AU - Jäger, Dirk
AU - Cortes, Eduardo
AU - Artyomov, Maxim N.
AU - Schreiber, Robert D.
N1 - Funding Information: We thank all the subjects who contributed to this study through donation of tumor and blood samples, as well as the research staff at UCLA and MSKCC for sample collection and processing. We acknowledge Olga Malkova, Diane E. Bender, Likui Yang, and Tammi Vickery for their work on MHC I multimer binding assay and nucleic acid isolation and sequencing; Jeff Bluestone, Jeff Hammerbacher, Ansuman Satpathy, and Robert Vonderheide for helpful and supportive comments; and David Liu and Eliezer van Allen for help in obtaining access to published data. TESLA was conceived collaboratively between the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI) and the Cancer Research Institute (CRI), and primary financial support came from PICI , a not-for-profit organization. Additional financial support was provided by NIH ( R21 AI34127 to A.S.), an NIH training grant ( GM08042 to J.M.Z.), a UCLA Tumor Immunology training grant ( NIH T32CA009120 ), the CRI Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (to K.M.C.), and the Queen Wilhelmina Cancer Research Award (to T.N.S.). Funding Information: We thank all the subjects who contributed to this study through donation of tumor and blood samples, as well as the research staff at UCLA and MSKCC for sample collection and processing. We acknowledge Olga Malkova, Diane E. Bender, Likui Yang, and Tammi Vickery for their work on MHC I multimer binding assay and nucleic acid isolation and sequencing; Jeff Bluestone, Jeff Hammerbacher, Ansuman Satpathy, and Robert Vonderheide for helpful and supportive comments; and David Liu and Eliezer van Allen for help in obtaining access to published data. TESLA was conceived collaboratively between the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI) and the Cancer Research Institute (CRI), and primary financial support came from PICI, a not-for-profit organization. Additional financial support was provided by NIH (R21 AI34127 to A.S.), an NIH training grant (GM08042 to J.M.Z.), a UCLA Tumor Immunology training grant (NIH T32CA009120), the CRI Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (to K.M.C.), and the Queen Wilhelmina Cancer Research Award (to T.N.S.). Conceptualization, V.M.H.-L. A.K. J.G. F.R. and R.D.S.; Methodology, D.K.W. N.A.D. K.K.D. J.G. A.K. N.H. A.S. J.R.H. N.B. F.R. R.D.S. T.N.S. and P.K.; Software, D.K.W. K.K.D. A.L. A.J.R. T.V.Y. X.C.D. and the Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance; Validation, M.M.v.B. T.N.S. and P.K.; Formal Analysis: D.K.W. and K.K.D.; Investigation: D.K.W. N.A.D. M.M.v.B. K.K.D. K.C.F.S. K.M.C. J.P.W. J.S. A.B.B. B.C.-A. A.H.C.N. W.C. G.M.S. and the Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance; Resources, K.K.D. K.C.F.S. A.L. J.P.W. A.J.R. J.M.Z. B.C-A. T.V.Y. H.R. J.M.C. P.M. the Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance, T.M. J.G. C.S. A.R. M.D.H. A.S. J.R.H. N.B. R.D.S. T.N.S. and P.K.S.; Data Curation, D.K.W. N.A.D. M.M.v.B. K.K.D. K.C.F.S. A.L. T.V.Y. H.R. J.M.C. and P.K.; Writing – Original Draft, D.K.W. and N.A.D.; Writing – Review & Editing, D.K.W. N.A.D. M.M.v.B. K.K.D. V.M.H.-L. K.C.F.S. M.D.H. N.H. F.R. R.D.S. T.N.S. and P.K.; Visualization, D.K.W. and N.A.D.; Supervision, N.A.D. D.K.W. M.M.v.B. K.K.D. K.C.F.S.T.M. J.G. C.S. A.R. M.D.H. N.H. A.S. J.R.H. N.B. F.R. R.D.S. T.N.S. and P.K.; Project Administration, N.A.D. D.K.W. K.K.D. C.S. F.R. and P.K. D.K.W. is a paid scientific advisor and shareholder in Immunai and receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb. M.M.v.B. is a stockholder and employee of BioNTech. V.M.H.-L. is an unpaid scientific advisor and holds equity in FX Biopharma. B.C.-A. has a contract grant with Kite Pharma and is a member of the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) at Advarra Inc. N.H. is a stockholder in BioNTech, K.M.C. is a stockholder in Geneoscopy. J.Z. is an equity/stock holder and consultant to PACT Pharma. A.R. has received honoraria from consulting with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, and Roche, is or has been a member of the scientific advisory board, and holds stock in Advaxis, Arcus Biosciences, Bioncotech Therapeutics, Compugen, CytomX, Five Prime, FLX-Bio, ImaginAb, Isoplexis, Kite-Gilead, Lutris Pharma, Merus, PACT Pharma, Rgenix, and Tango Therapeutics. M.D.H. receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, has been a compensated consultant for Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Nektar, Syndax, Mirati, Shattuck Labs, Immunai, Blueprint Medicines, Achilles, and Arcus, received travel support/honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, has options from Shattuck Labs, Immunai, and Arcus, and has a patent filed by his institution related to the use of tumor mutation burden to predict response to immunotherapy (PCT/US2015/062208), which has received licensing fees from PGDx. P.K. is a consultant for Neon Therapeutics and Personalis. J.R.H. is board member and founder of Isoplexis and board member and founder of PACT. F.R. is an advisor/consultant to Equillium Bio, Good Therapeutics, SelectION, Inc. Cascade Drug Development Group, aTyr Pharma, and Lumos Pharma, and is a founder and holds equity in Sonoma Biotherapeutics. R.D.S. is a cofounder, scientific advisory board member, stockholder, and royalty recipient of Jounce Therapeutics and Neon Therapeutics and is a scientific advisory board member for A2 Biotherapeutics, BioLegend, Codiak Biosciences, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, and Sensei Biotherapeutics. J.S. and A.S. receive funding from BMS and Gritstone, are consultants for Turnstone, and perform fee-for-service assays for Neon. A.S. is a consultant for Gritstone. N.B. receives research funds from Novocure, Celldex, Ludwig institute, Genentech, Oncovir, Melanoma Research Alliance, Cancer Research Institute, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, 485, NYSTEM, and Regeneron, and is on the advisory boards of Neon, Tempest, Checkpoint Sciences, Curevac, Primevax, Novartis, Array BioPharma, Roche, and Avidea. T.N.S. receives research funds from Merck KGaA, is consultant/advisory board member for Adaptive Biotechnologies, AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Scenic Biotech, and Third Rock Ventures, and is a stockholder in AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, BioNTech, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics, Scenic Biotech, and Third Rock Ventures Fund IV and V. A.R. has received honoraria from consulting with Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, is or has been a member of the scientific advisory board, holds stock in Advaxis, Apricity, Arcus Biosciences, Bioncotech Therapeutics, Compugen, CytomX, Five Prime, FLX-Bio, ImaginAb, Isoplexis, Kite-Gilead, Lutris Pharma, Merus, PACT Pharma, Rgenix, and Tango Therapeutics, has received research funding from Agilent and from Bristol-Myers Squibb through Stand Up to Cancer (SU2C), and has received payment for licensing a patent on non-viral T cell gene editing to Arsenal. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/10/29
Y1 - 2020/10/29
N2 - Many approaches to identify therapeutically relevant neoantigens couple tumor sequencing with bioinformatic algorithms and inferred rules of tumor epitope immunogenicity. However, there are no reference data to compare these approaches, and the parameters governing tumor epitope immunogenicity remain unclear. Here, we assembled a global consortium wherein each participant predicted immunogenic epitopes from shared tumor sequencing data. 608 epitopes were subsequently assessed for T cell binding in patient-matched samples. By integrating peptide features associated with presentation and recognition, we developed a model of tumor epitope immunogenicity that filtered out 98% of non-immunogenic peptides with a precision above 0.70. Pipelines prioritizing model features had superior performance, and pipeline alterations leveraging them improved prediction performance. These findings were validated in an independent cohort of 310 epitopes prioritized from tumor sequencing data and assessed for T cell binding. This data resource enables identification of parameters underlying effective anti-tumor immunity and is available to the research community. Genomic tumor sequencing data with matched measurements of tumor epitope immunogenicity allows for insights into the governing parameters of epitope immunogenicity and generation of models for effective neoantigen prediction.
AB - Many approaches to identify therapeutically relevant neoantigens couple tumor sequencing with bioinformatic algorithms and inferred rules of tumor epitope immunogenicity. However, there are no reference data to compare these approaches, and the parameters governing tumor epitope immunogenicity remain unclear. Here, we assembled a global consortium wherein each participant predicted immunogenic epitopes from shared tumor sequencing data. 608 epitopes were subsequently assessed for T cell binding in patient-matched samples. By integrating peptide features associated with presentation and recognition, we developed a model of tumor epitope immunogenicity that filtered out 98% of non-immunogenic peptides with a precision above 0.70. Pipelines prioritizing model features had superior performance, and pipeline alterations leveraging them improved prediction performance. These findings were validated in an independent cohort of 310 epitopes prioritized from tumor sequencing data and assessed for T cell binding. This data resource enables identification of parameters underlying effective anti-tumor immunity and is available to the research community. Genomic tumor sequencing data with matched measurements of tumor epitope immunogenicity allows for insights into the governing parameters of epitope immunogenicity and generation of models for effective neoantigen prediction.
KW - TESLA
KW - epitope
KW - immunogenicity
KW - immunogenomics
KW - immunotherapy
KW - neoantigen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094120480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 33038342
AN - SCOPUS:85094120480
SN - 0092-8674
VL - 183
SP - 818-834.e13
JO - Cell
JF - Cell
IS - 3
ER -