Judiciary and judicial behaviour

Lee Epstein, Urška Šadl, Keren Weinshall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

These are momentous times for the comparative analysis of judicial behaviour. Once the sole province of United States scholars - and mostly political scientists at that - researchers throughout the world are drawing on history, economics, law, and psychology to illuminate how and why judges make the choices they do. Our goal is to supply an introduction to this exciting field with an eye toward encouraging even more social scientists to contribute with studies of their own. To that end, the second section provides a foreword to the comparative analysis of judicial behaviour, emphasizing the goals and the range of questions that come under the field's reach. The third section surveys the major approaches to which scholars turn to develop research questions and generate possible answers. The fourth section delves into the range of data sources and methods used to assess the possible answers and evaluate findings. Throughout, we flag opportunities for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Comparative Political Institutions
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages347-361
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781803929095
ISBN (Print)9781803929088
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 22 2024

Keywords

  • Ideology
  • Judicial behaviour
  • Labour market model
  • Legalism
  • Rational choice
  • Social identity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judiciary and judicial behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this