TY - JOUR
T1 - Ischaemic stroke on anticoagulation therapy and early recurrence in acute cardioembolic stroke
T2 - The IAC study
AU - Yaghi, Shadi
AU - Henninger, Nils
AU - Giles, James A.
AU - Leon Guerrero, Christopher
AU - Mistry, Eva
AU - Liberman, Ava L.
AU - Asad, Daniyal
AU - Liu, Angela
AU - Nagy, Muhammad
AU - Kaushal, Ashutosh
AU - Azher, Idrees
AU - Mac Grory, Brian
AU - Fakhri, Hiba
AU - Brown Espaillat, Kiersten
AU - Pasupuleti, Hemanth
AU - Martin, Heather
AU - Tan, Jose
AU - Veerasamy, Manivannan
AU - Esenwa, Charles
AU - Cheng, Natalie
AU - Moncrieffe, Khadean
AU - Moeini-Naghani, Iman
AU - Siddu, Mithilesh
AU - Scher, Erica
AU - Trivedi, Tushar
AU - Furie, Karen L.
AU - Keyrouz, Salah G.
AU - Nouh, Amre
AU - de Havenon, Adam
AU - Khan, Muhib
AU - Smith, Eric E.
AU - Gurol, M. Edip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Background and purpose A subset of ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation. We sought to determine the association between prestroke anticoagulant therapy and recurrent ischaemic events and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH). Methods We included consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF from the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study from eight comprehensive stroke centres in the USA. We compared recurrent ischaemic events and delayed sICH risk using adjusted Cox regression analyses between patients who were prescribed anticoagulation (ACp) versus patients who were naïve to anticoagulation therapy prior to the ischaemic stroke (anticoagulation naïve). Results Among 2084 patients in IAC, 1518 had prior anticoagulation status recorded and were followed for 90 days. In adjusted Cox hazard models, ACp was associated with some evidence of a higher risk higher risk of 90-day recurrent ischaemic events only in the fully adjusted model (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.28, p=0.058) but not increased risk of 90-day sICH (adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.51, p=0.862). In addition, switching anticoagulation class was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischaemic events (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.33, p=0.136) nor sICH (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 7.50, p=0.641). Conclusion AF patients with ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation may have higher recurrent ischaemic event risk compared with anticoagulation-naïve patients. This suggests differing underlying pathomechanisms requiring different stroke prevention measures and identifying these mechanisms may improve secondary prevention strategies.
AB - Background and purpose A subset of ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation. We sought to determine the association between prestroke anticoagulant therapy and recurrent ischaemic events and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH). Methods We included consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF from the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study from eight comprehensive stroke centres in the USA. We compared recurrent ischaemic events and delayed sICH risk using adjusted Cox regression analyses between patients who were prescribed anticoagulation (ACp) versus patients who were naïve to anticoagulation therapy prior to the ischaemic stroke (anticoagulation naïve). Results Among 2084 patients in IAC, 1518 had prior anticoagulation status recorded and were followed for 90 days. In adjusted Cox hazard models, ACp was associated with some evidence of a higher risk higher risk of 90-day recurrent ischaemic events only in the fully adjusted model (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.28, p=0.058) but not increased risk of 90-day sICH (adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.51, p=0.862). In addition, switching anticoagulation class was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischaemic events (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.33, p=0.136) nor sICH (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 7.50, p=0.641). Conclusion AF patients with ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation may have higher recurrent ischaemic event risk compared with anticoagulation-naïve patients. This suggests differing underlying pathomechanisms requiring different stroke prevention measures and identifying these mechanisms may improve secondary prevention strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104887364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326166
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326166
M3 - Article
C2 - 33903185
AN - SCOPUS:85104887364
SN - 0022-3050
VL - 92
SP - 1062
EP - 1067
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
IS - 10
ER -