Ischaemic stroke on anticoagulation therapy and early recurrence in acute cardioembolic stroke: The IAC study

Shadi Yaghi, Nils Henninger, James A. Giles, Christopher Leon Guerrero, Eva Mistry, Ava L. Liberman, Daniyal Asad, Angela Liu, Muhammad Nagy, Ashutosh Kaushal, Idrees Azher, Brian Mac Grory, Hiba Fakhri, Kiersten Brown Espaillat, Hemanth Pasupuleti, Heather Martin, Jose Tan, Manivannan Veerasamy, Charles Esenwa, Natalie ChengKhadean Moncrieffe, Iman Moeini-Naghani, Mithilesh Siddu, Erica Scher, Tushar Trivedi, Karen L. Furie, Salah G. Keyrouz, Amre Nouh, Adam de Havenon, Muhib Khan, Eric E. Smith, M. Edip Gurol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and purpose A subset of ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation. We sought to determine the association between prestroke anticoagulant therapy and recurrent ischaemic events and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH). Methods We included consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF from the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study from eight comprehensive stroke centres in the USA. We compared recurrent ischaemic events and delayed sICH risk using adjusted Cox regression analyses between patients who were prescribed anticoagulation (ACp) versus patients who were naïve to anticoagulation therapy prior to the ischaemic stroke (anticoagulation naïve). Results Among 2084 patients in IAC, 1518 had prior anticoagulation status recorded and were followed for 90 days. In adjusted Cox hazard models, ACp was associated with some evidence of a higher risk higher risk of 90-day recurrent ischaemic events only in the fully adjusted model (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.28, p=0.058) but not increased risk of 90-day sICH (adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.51, p=0.862). In addition, switching anticoagulation class was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischaemic events (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.33, p=0.136) nor sICH (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 7.50, p=0.641). Conclusion AF patients with ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation may have higher recurrent ischaemic event risk compared with anticoagulation-naïve patients. This suggests differing underlying pathomechanisms requiring different stroke prevention measures and identifying these mechanisms may improve secondary prevention strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1062-1067
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume92
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ischaemic stroke on anticoagulation therapy and early recurrence in acute cardioembolic stroke: The IAC study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this