TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia affected by the increased use of heparin for VTE prophylaxis?
AU - Zhou, Amy
AU - Winkler, Anne
AU - Emamifar, Amir
AU - Gartland, Bryce
AU - Duncan, Alexander
AU - Antun, Ana
AU - Arellano, Martha
AU - Tindol, G. Allen
AU - Levy, Jerrold H.
AU - Bornstein, William A.
AU - Horowitz, Ira R.
AU - Khoury, Hanna Jean
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Background: The increased exposure to heparin products for thromboprophylaxis against VTE in hospitalized patients raises concerns for an increase in the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Methods: We analyzed, among 90,875 patients exposed to heparin products between 2005 and 2009, the number of hematologic consultations for thrombocytopenia, requests for heparininduced antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cases given a diagnosis of HIT by the hematology consult service. Results: We observed that despite a doubling in the number of patients receiving pharmacoprophylaxis with heparin, there was no significant increase in the number of consultations for thrombocytopenia, the number of requests for HIT tests, the number of positive HIT test results, or the number of HIT diagnoses. The number of cases of HIT was low and represented <0.1% of patients exposed to heparin. Conclusions: We conclude that concerns about HIT should not be a limiting factor for the systematic implementation of heparin-based VTE prophylaxis.
AB - Background: The increased exposure to heparin products for thromboprophylaxis against VTE in hospitalized patients raises concerns for an increase in the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Methods: We analyzed, among 90,875 patients exposed to heparin products between 2005 and 2009, the number of hematologic consultations for thrombocytopenia, requests for heparininduced antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cases given a diagnosis of HIT by the hematology consult service. Results: We observed that despite a doubling in the number of patients receiving pharmacoprophylaxis with heparin, there was no significant increase in the number of consultations for thrombocytopenia, the number of requests for HIT tests, the number of positive HIT test results, or the number of HIT diagnoses. The number of cases of HIT was low and represented <0.1% of patients exposed to heparin. Conclusions: We conclude that concerns about HIT should not be a limiting factor for the systematic implementation of heparin-based VTE prophylaxis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868611638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1378/chest.11-2926
DO - 10.1378/chest.11-2926
M3 - Article
C2 - 22539642
AN - SCOPUS:84868611638
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 142
SP - 1175
EP - 1178
JO - CHEST
JF - CHEST
IS - 5
ER -