TY - JOUR
T1 - Ionic surface propensity controls pH in nanopores
AU - Zhu, Yaguang
AU - Derami, Hamed Gholami
AU - Gupta, Prashant
AU - Gupta, Rohit
AU - Singamaneni, Srikanth
AU - Jun, Young Shin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/11/10
Y1 - 2022/11/10
N2 - To predict many proton-involved reactions in natural and engineered systems, a better understanding of the difference between the solution pH in nanopores and the pH in the bulk solution is critical. However, how the pH in nanopores changes in response to changes in the bulk solution composition remains elusive. Here, the capability of surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy to measure both pH and ion concentrations enables us to discover a new mechanism: opposite ionic surface propensities induce differences in aqueous concentration and control the pH in nanopores. As further confirmed by our modified Poisson-Boltzmann model, in negatively charged nanopores, anion concentrations are still enhanced, whereas cation concentrations are suppressed. These effects can change the buffer's conjugated acid and base ratio and attract protons to compensate for the excess negative charge in nanopores. Collectively, compared with the bulk solution pH, these factors cause an unexpectedly low pH in nanopores.
AB - To predict many proton-involved reactions in natural and engineered systems, a better understanding of the difference between the solution pH in nanopores and the pH in the bulk solution is critical. However, how the pH in nanopores changes in response to changes in the bulk solution composition remains elusive. Here, the capability of surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy to measure both pH and ion concentrations enables us to discover a new mechanism: opposite ionic surface propensities induce differences in aqueous concentration and control the pH in nanopores. As further confirmed by our modified Poisson-Boltzmann model, in negatively charged nanopores, anion concentrations are still enhanced, whereas cation concentrations are suppressed. These effects can change the buffer's conjugated acid and base ratio and attract protons to compensate for the excess negative charge in nanopores. Collectively, compared with the bulk solution pH, these factors cause an unexpectedly low pH in nanopores.
KW - SDG6: Clean water and sanitation
KW - SDG7: Affordable and clean energy
KW - buffer
KW - nanopore
KW - pH
KW - solution chemistry
KW - surface propensity
KW - surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141233475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.021
DO - 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141233475
SN - 2451-9308
VL - 8
SP - 3081
EP - 3095
JO - Chem
JF - Chem
IS - 11
ER -