TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in early stage breast cancer
T2 - results from SEER database
AU - Lei, Juan
AU - Wang, Yi
AU - Bi, Zhuofei
AU - Xue, Shengneng
AU - Ou, Bing
AU - Liu, Kan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Japan Radiological Society.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Purpose: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as an alternative to whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for early breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for survival after IORT or whole-breast EBRT in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients undergoing IORT or whole-breast EBRT were included from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: The IORT and EBRT groups did not differ significantly in OS and CSS. T2 stage (tumor size > 2 cm) was associated with poorer OS (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 1.05–11.62, P = 0.042), whereas ER-positive tumors were associated with better OS (aHR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09–0.76, P = 0.014). Conclusion: IORT was not inferior than EBRT considering the OS and CSS in the short-term follow-up of early breast cancer. It may be a reasonable alternative to EBRT for early breast cancer in select patients with favorable tumor size and receptor status, given the need for long-term monitoring of local control and radiation toxicity.
AB - Purpose: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as an alternative to whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for early breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for survival after IORT or whole-breast EBRT in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients undergoing IORT or whole-breast EBRT were included from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: The IORT and EBRT groups did not differ significantly in OS and CSS. T2 stage (tumor size > 2 cm) was associated with poorer OS (aHR 3.49, 95% CI 1.05–11.62, P = 0.042), whereas ER-positive tumors were associated with better OS (aHR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09–0.76, P = 0.014). Conclusion: IORT was not inferior than EBRT considering the OS and CSS in the short-term follow-up of early breast cancer. It may be a reasonable alternative to EBRT for early breast cancer in select patients with favorable tumor size and receptor status, given the need for long-term monitoring of local control and radiation toxicity.
KW - Early stage breast cancer
KW - Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT)
KW - Prognosis
KW - Survival
KW - Whole-breast external beam radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074768421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11604-019-00891-7
DO - 10.1007/s11604-019-00891-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 31691091
AN - SCOPUS:85074768421
SN - 1867-1071
VL - 38
SP - 85
EP - 92
JO - Japanese Journal of Radiology
JF - Japanese Journal of Radiology
IS - 1
ER -