TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative Computed Tomography Use in Orbital Fracture Repair
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Liu, Yupeng
AU - Enin, Kwasi
AU - Sciegienka, Sebastian
AU - Hardi, Angela
AU - Spataro, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Background: Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) allows surgeons to make adjustments during orbital fracture repair that may impact postoperative outcomes. Learning/Study Objectives: To determine the impact of intraoperative CT use on intraoperative revision and surgical outcomes for orbital fracture repair. Methods: A systematic review was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines: the population was patients undergoing orbital fracture repair; intervention was use of intraoperative CT; comparison was patients not undergoing intraoperative CT; and outcomes were intraoperative revision rate, postoperative complications, and secondary revision surgeries. Meta-analysis was performed on the rate of intraoperative revision. Results: The search criteria yielded 790 articles, 377 were eligible for review, and 20 articles met criteria for analysis. In 19, intraoperative imaging led to immediate surgical corrections, with a random pooled effect size of 0.27 (0.20–0.35). Six studies reported secondary revision surgery rates (range 0–10.5%), and six studies reported postoperative complication rates (range 10–30%). Conclusions: Intraoperative imaging helps surgeons make precise, real-time adjustments in 27% of orbital fracture repair cases, which may improve surgical outcomes; however, more research is needed to investigate its impact on health care costs, operating time, and radiation exposure.
AB - Background: Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) allows surgeons to make adjustments during orbital fracture repair that may impact postoperative outcomes. Learning/Study Objectives: To determine the impact of intraoperative CT use on intraoperative revision and surgical outcomes for orbital fracture repair. Methods: A systematic review was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines: the population was patients undergoing orbital fracture repair; intervention was use of intraoperative CT; comparison was patients not undergoing intraoperative CT; and outcomes were intraoperative revision rate, postoperative complications, and secondary revision surgeries. Meta-analysis was performed on the rate of intraoperative revision. Results: The search criteria yielded 790 articles, 377 were eligible for review, and 20 articles met criteria for analysis. In 19, intraoperative imaging led to immediate surgical corrections, with a random pooled effect size of 0.27 (0.20–0.35). Six studies reported secondary revision surgery rates (range 0–10.5%), and six studies reported postoperative complication rates (range 10–30%). Conclusions: Intraoperative imaging helps surgeons make precise, real-time adjustments in 27% of orbital fracture repair cases, which may improve surgical outcomes; however, more research is needed to investigate its impact on health care costs, operating time, and radiation exposure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174238393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0143
DO - 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0143
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37782903
AN - SCOPUS:85174238393
SN - 2689-3614
VL - 25
SP - 548
EP - 555
JO - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
JF - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
IS - 6
ER -