TY - JOUR
T1 - Intracranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy With a Jawless Ring Gantry Linear Accelerator Equipped With New Dual Layer Multileaf Collimator
AU - Knutson, Nels C.
AU - Kennedy, William R.
AU - Reynoso, Francisco J.
AU - Peng, Jiayuan
AU - Henke, Lauren E.
AU - Laugeman, Eric
AU - Watts, Michael
AU - Hillard, Jessica
AU - Heermann, Ana
AU - Hugo, Geoffrey D.
AU - Mutic, Sasa
AU - Cai, Bin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Purpose: To test the feasibility of a simplified, robust, workflow for intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) using a ring gantry linear accelerator (RGLA) equipped with a dual-layer stacked, staggered, and interdigitating multileaf collimator. Materials and Methods: Twenty recent clinical SRT cases treated using a radiosurgery c-arm linear accelerator were anonymized. From these data sets, a new planning workflow was developed and used to replan these cases, which then were compared to their clinical counterparts. Population-based dose-volume histograms were analyzed for target coverage and sparing of healthy brain. All plans underwent plan review and quality assurance and were delivered on an end-to-end verification phantom using image guidance to simulate treatment. Results: The RGLA plans were able to meet departmental standards for target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing and showed plan quality similar to the clinical plans. RGLA plans showed increases in the 50% isodose in the axial plane but decreases in the sagittal and coronal planes. There were no statistically significant differences in the homogeneity index or number of monitor units between the 2 systems. There were statistically significant increases in conformity and gradient indices, with median values of 1.09 versus 1.11 and 2.82 versus 3.13, respectively, for the c-arm versus RGLA plans. These differences were not believed to be clinically significant because they met clinical goals. The population-based dose-volume histograms showed target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing similar to that of the clinical plans. All plans were able to meet the departmental quality assurance requirements and were delivered under image guidance on an end-to-end phantom with measurements agreeing within 3% of the expected value. RGLA plans showed a median reduction in delivery time of ≈50%. Conclusions: This work describes a simplified and efficient workflow that could reduce treatment times and expand access to SRT to centers using an RGLA.
AB - Purpose: To test the feasibility of a simplified, robust, workflow for intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) using a ring gantry linear accelerator (RGLA) equipped with a dual-layer stacked, staggered, and interdigitating multileaf collimator. Materials and Methods: Twenty recent clinical SRT cases treated using a radiosurgery c-arm linear accelerator were anonymized. From these data sets, a new planning workflow was developed and used to replan these cases, which then were compared to their clinical counterparts. Population-based dose-volume histograms were analyzed for target coverage and sparing of healthy brain. All plans underwent plan review and quality assurance and were delivered on an end-to-end verification phantom using image guidance to simulate treatment. Results: The RGLA plans were able to meet departmental standards for target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing and showed plan quality similar to the clinical plans. RGLA plans showed increases in the 50% isodose in the axial plane but decreases in the sagittal and coronal planes. There were no statistically significant differences in the homogeneity index or number of monitor units between the 2 systems. There were statistically significant increases in conformity and gradient indices, with median values of 1.09 versus 1.11 and 2.82 versus 3.13, respectively, for the c-arm versus RGLA plans. These differences were not believed to be clinically significant because they met clinical goals. The population-based dose-volume histograms showed target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing similar to that of the clinical plans. All plans were able to meet the departmental quality assurance requirements and were delivered under image guidance on an end-to-end phantom with measurements agreeing within 3% of the expected value. RGLA plans showed a median reduction in delivery time of ≈50%. Conclusions: This work describes a simplified and efficient workflow that could reduce treatment times and expand access to SRT to centers using an RGLA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081932147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2020.01.003
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2020.01.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 32529144
AN - SCOPUS:85081932147
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 5
SP - 482
EP - 489
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 3
ER -