TY - JOUR
T1 - Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location
AU - Koka, Kanthaiah
AU - Riggs, William Jason
AU - Dwyer, Robert
AU - Holder, Jourdan Taylor
AU - Noble, Jack H.
AU - Dawant, Benoit M.
AU - Ortmann, Amanda
AU - Valenzuela, Carla V.
AU - Mattingly, Jameson K.
AU - Harris, Michael M.
AU - O'Connell, Brendan P.
AU - Litvak, Leonid M.
AU - Adunka, Oliver F.
AU - Buchman, Craig Alan
AU - Labadie, Robert F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kanthaiah Koka, Ph.D., Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, CA; E-mail: kanthaiah.koka@ advancedbionics.com Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders within the National Institutes of Health, through the ‘‘Development of Clinician/ Researchers in Academic ENT’’ training grant, award number T32DC000022. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Hypothesis: Electrocochleography (ECochG) patterns observed during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion may provide information about scalar location of the electrode array. Background: Conventional CI surgery is performed without actively monitoring auditory function and potential damage to intracochlear structures. The central hypothesis of this study was that ECochG obtained directly through the CI may be used to estimate intracochlear electrode position and, ultimately, residual hearing preservation. Methods: Intracochlear ECochG was performed on 32 patients across 3 different implant centers. During electrode insertion, a 50-ms tone burst stimulus (500 Hz) was delivered at 110 dB SPL. The ECochG response was monitored from the apical-most electrode. The amplitude and phase changes of the first harmonic were imported into an algorithm in an attempt to predict the intracochlear electrode location (scala tympani [ST], translocation from ST to scala vestibuli [SV], or interaction with basilar membrane). Anatomic electrode position was verified using postoperative computed tomography (CT) with image processing. Results: CT analysis confirmed 25 electrodes with ST position and 7 electrode arrays translocating from ST into SV. The ECochG algorithm correctly estimated electrode position in 26 (82%) of 32 subjects while 6 (18%) electrodes were wrongly identified as translocated (sensitivity=100%, specificity=77%, positive predictive value=54%, and a negative predictive value=100%). Greater hearing loss was observed postoperatively in participants with translocated electrode arrays (36±15 dB) when compared with isolated ST insertions (28±20 dB HL). This result, however, was not significant ( p=0.789). Conclusion: Intracochlear ECochG may provide information about CI electrode location and hearing preservation.
AB - Hypothesis: Electrocochleography (ECochG) patterns observed during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion may provide information about scalar location of the electrode array. Background: Conventional CI surgery is performed without actively monitoring auditory function and potential damage to intracochlear structures. The central hypothesis of this study was that ECochG obtained directly through the CI may be used to estimate intracochlear electrode position and, ultimately, residual hearing preservation. Methods: Intracochlear ECochG was performed on 32 patients across 3 different implant centers. During electrode insertion, a 50-ms tone burst stimulus (500 Hz) was delivered at 110 dB SPL. The ECochG response was monitored from the apical-most electrode. The amplitude and phase changes of the first harmonic were imported into an algorithm in an attempt to predict the intracochlear electrode location (scala tympani [ST], translocation from ST to scala vestibuli [SV], or interaction with basilar membrane). Anatomic electrode position was verified using postoperative computed tomography (CT) with image processing. Results: CT analysis confirmed 25 electrodes with ST position and 7 electrode arrays translocating from ST into SV. The ECochG algorithm correctly estimated electrode position in 26 (82%) of 32 subjects while 6 (18%) electrodes were wrongly identified as translocated (sensitivity=100%, specificity=77%, positive predictive value=54%, and a negative predictive value=100%). Greater hearing loss was observed postoperatively in participants with translocated electrode arrays (36±15 dB) when compared with isolated ST insertions (28±20 dB HL). This result, however, was not significant ( p=0.789). Conclusion: Intracochlear ECochG may provide information about CI electrode location and hearing preservation.
KW - Cochlear implantation
KW - Electrocochleography
KW - Scala tympani
KW - Scala vestibuli
KW - Scalar translocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059314278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001906
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001906
M3 - Article
C2 - 30113557
AN - SCOPUS:85059314278
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 39
SP - E654-E659
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 8
ER -