TY - JOUR
T1 - Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of determining the deformity angular ratio in severe pediatric deformity curves
AU - Fox Pediatric Spinal Deformity Study Group
AU - Zuckerman, Scott L.
AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.
AU - Cerpa, Meghan
AU - Kelly, Michael P.
AU - Yaszay, Burt
AU - Sponseller, Paul
AU - Erickson, Mark
AU - Garg, Sumeet
AU - Pahys, Joshua
AU - Cahill, Patrick
AU - Sides, Brenda
AU - Gupta, Munish
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Scoliosis Research Society.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Study design: Cross-sectional reliability study. Objective: The deformity angular ratio (DAR) is a means of quantifying magnitude of the coronal (C-DAR) and sagittal (S-DAR) plane of deformity curves to produce a total DAR (T-DAR). It has been shown to predict the risk of spinal cord monitoring alerts and actual neurologic deficits. We sought to assess the reliability of determining the C-DAR and S-DAR among pediatric spinal deformity surgeons. Methods: Twelve preoperative anterior–posterior (AP) and lateral X-rays from the Fox multi-center pediatric deformity study were de-identified and sent to7 pediatric spinal deformity surgeons. Each surgeon measured: coronal/sagittal Cobb angles, upper/lower endplate vertebrae (UEV/LEV), apices, and number of vertebrae included in the main curve. The C-DAR and S-DAR were then calculated by dividing the Cobb angles by the number of vertebrae included in the curve. Intra- and interobserver reliability was calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). Results: The mean C-DAR was 14.9 (range 1.3–51.5) with a mean Cobb angle of 88.8° (range 15.0–163.0) over a mean of 7.5 (range 2.0–14.0) levels. The mean S-DAR was 8.6 (range 1.0–19.6), with a mean Cobb angle of 68.0° (range 10.0–137.0) over a mean of 7.5 (range 3–11) levels. The intraobserver reliability of the C-DAR was ICC = 0.908 (range 0.846–0.960) and the S-DAR 0.914 (range 0.815–0.961). The interobserver reliability of the C-DAR was ICC = 0.868 (range 0.846–0.938), and the S-DAR was ICC = 0.848 (range 0.815–0.961). Despite poor reliability among UEV, LEV, and apex selection (aggregated range 0.340–0.724), the C-DAR and S-DAR were demonstrated to be reliable in our study Conclusions: Reliability was good to excellent for C-DAR and S-DAR, despite poor to moderate reliability among UEV, LEV, and apex selection. These data support the use of the C-DAR, S-DAR, and combined T-DAR as a means of quantifying deformity magnitude.
AB - Study design: Cross-sectional reliability study. Objective: The deformity angular ratio (DAR) is a means of quantifying magnitude of the coronal (C-DAR) and sagittal (S-DAR) plane of deformity curves to produce a total DAR (T-DAR). It has been shown to predict the risk of spinal cord monitoring alerts and actual neurologic deficits. We sought to assess the reliability of determining the C-DAR and S-DAR among pediatric spinal deformity surgeons. Methods: Twelve preoperative anterior–posterior (AP) and lateral X-rays from the Fox multi-center pediatric deformity study were de-identified and sent to7 pediatric spinal deformity surgeons. Each surgeon measured: coronal/sagittal Cobb angles, upper/lower endplate vertebrae (UEV/LEV), apices, and number of vertebrae included in the main curve. The C-DAR and S-DAR were then calculated by dividing the Cobb angles by the number of vertebrae included in the curve. Intra- and interobserver reliability was calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). Results: The mean C-DAR was 14.9 (range 1.3–51.5) with a mean Cobb angle of 88.8° (range 15.0–163.0) over a mean of 7.5 (range 2.0–14.0) levels. The mean S-DAR was 8.6 (range 1.0–19.6), with a mean Cobb angle of 68.0° (range 10.0–137.0) over a mean of 7.5 (range 3–11) levels. The intraobserver reliability of the C-DAR was ICC = 0.908 (range 0.846–0.960) and the S-DAR 0.914 (range 0.815–0.961). The interobserver reliability of the C-DAR was ICC = 0.868 (range 0.846–0.938), and the S-DAR was ICC = 0.848 (range 0.815–0.961). Despite poor reliability among UEV, LEV, and apex selection (aggregated range 0.340–0.724), the C-DAR and S-DAR were demonstrated to be reliable in our study Conclusions: Reliability was good to excellent for C-DAR and S-DAR, despite poor to moderate reliability among UEV, LEV, and apex selection. These data support the use of the C-DAR, S-DAR, and combined T-DAR as a means of quantifying deformity magnitude.
KW - Cobb angle
KW - Deformity angular ratio
KW - Early onset scoliosis
KW - Neuromuscular scoliosis
KW - Pediatric
KW - Scoliosis
KW - Spinal deformity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096103242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-020-00239-6
DO - 10.1007/s43390-020-00239-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33201497
AN - SCOPUS:85096103242
SN - 2212-134X
VL - 9
SP - 435
EP - 440
JO - Spine deformity
JF - Spine deformity
IS - 2
ER -