Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information

Bridgid Finn, Henry L. Roediger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 7 experiments, we explored the role of retrieval in associative updating, that is, in incorporating new information into an associative memory. We tested the hypothesis that retrieval would facilitate incorporating a new contextual detail into a learned association. Participants learned 3 pieces of information-a person's face, name, and profession (in Experiments 1-5). In the 1st phase, participants in all conditions learned faces and names. In the 2nd phase, participants either restudied the face-name pair (the restudy condition) or were given the face and asked to retrieve the name (the test condition). In the 3rd phase, professions were presented for study just after restudy or testing. Our prediction was that the new information (the profession) would be more readily learned following retrieval of the face-name association compared to restudy of the face-name association. However, we found that the act of retrieval generally undermined acquisition of new associations rather than facilitating them. This detrimental effect emerged on both immediate and delayed tests. Further, the effect was not due to selective attention to feedback because we found impairment whether or not feedback was provided after the Phase 2 test. The data are novel in showing that the act of retrieving information can inhibit the ability to learn new information shortly thereafter. The results are difficult to accommodate within current theories that mostly emphasize benefits of retrieval for learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1665-1681
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Memory malleability
  • Memory retrieval
  • Updating

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this