TY - JOUR
T1 - Interdisciplinary handover between obstetric nursing and neonatal physician teams
T2 - An observational study
AU - Arora, Anshul
AU - Kannampallil, Thomas
AU - Abraham, Joanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objective We investigated the content and quality of communication of interservice interprofessional handover between obstetric nurses and neonatal physicians for high-risk deliveries. Design Observational study. Setting Labour and delivery unit at a tertiary care hospital. Method We audio-recorded handovers between obstetric and neonatal teams (n=50) and conducted clinician interviews (n=29). A handover content framework was developed and used to qualitatively code missing core and ancillary content and their potential for adverse events. Results 26 (52%) handovers missed one or more clinical content elements; a third of the handovers missed at least one core clinical content element. Increase in the number of missed clinical content elements increased the odds of potential adverse events by 2.39 (95% CI1.18 to 5.37). Both residents and nurses perceived handovers to be of low quality and inconsistent and attributed it to the lack of a structured handover process. Conclusion Streamlining handover processes by instituting standardisation approaches for both information organisation and communication can improve the quality of neonatal handovers.
AB - Objective We investigated the content and quality of communication of interservice interprofessional handover between obstetric nurses and neonatal physicians for high-risk deliveries. Design Observational study. Setting Labour and delivery unit at a tertiary care hospital. Method We audio-recorded handovers between obstetric and neonatal teams (n=50) and conducted clinician interviews (n=29). A handover content framework was developed and used to qualitatively code missing core and ancillary content and their potential for adverse events. Results 26 (52%) handovers missed one or more clinical content elements; a third of the handovers missed at least one core clinical content element. Increase in the number of missed clinical content elements increased the odds of potential adverse events by 2.39 (95% CI1.18 to 5.37). Both residents and nurses perceived handovers to be of low quality and inconsistent and attributed it to the lack of a structured handover process. Conclusion Streamlining handover processes by instituting standardisation approaches for both information organisation and communication can improve the quality of neonatal handovers.
KW - neonatology
KW - nursing
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073041258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000432
DO - 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000432
M3 - Article
C2 - 31206078
AN - SCOPUS:85073041258
SN - 2399-9772
VL - 3
JO - BMJ Paediatrics Open
JF - BMJ Paediatrics Open
IS - 1
ER -