Inter-rater reliability and prognostic value of baseline Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) scores in observational cohort studies of inpatients with COVID-19

Nameer Al-Yousif, Saketram Komanduri, Hafiz Qurashi, Anatoliy Korzhuk, Halimat O. Lawal, Nicholas Abourizk, Caitlin Schaefer, Kevin J. Mitchell, Catherine M. Dietz, Ellen K. Hughes, Clara S. Brandt, Georgia M. Fitzgerald, Robin Joyce, Asmaa S. Chaudhry, Daniel Kotok, Jose D. Rivera, Andrew I. Kim, Shruti Shettigar, Allen Lavina, Christine E. GirardSamantha R. Gillenwater, Anas Hadeh, William Bain, Faraaz A. Shah, Matthew Bittner, Michael Lu, Niall Prendergast, John Evankovich, Konstantin Golubykh, Navitha Ramesh, Jana J. Jacobs, Cathy Kessinger, Barbara Methe, Janet S. Lee, Alison Morris, Bryan J. McVerry, Georgios D. Kitsios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To reliably quantify the radiographic severity of COVID-19 pneumonia with the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score on clinical chest X-rays among inpatients and examine the prognostic value of baseline RALE scores on COVID-19 clinical outcomes. SETTING: Hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in dedicated wards and intensive care units from two different hospital systems. PARTICIPANTS: 425 patients with COVID-19 in a discovery data set and 415 patients in a validation data set. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We measured inter-rater reliability for RALE score annotations by different reviewers and examined for associations of consensus RALE scores with the level of respiratory support, demographics, physiologic variables, applied therapies, plasma host-response biomarkers, SARS-CoV-2 RNA load and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement for RALE scores improved from fair to excellent following reviewer training and feedback (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 vs 0.93, respectively). In the discovery cohort, the required level of respiratory support at the time of CXR acquisition (supplemental oxygen or non-invasive ventilation (n=178); invasive-mechanical ventilation (n=234), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n=13)) was significantly associated with RALE scores (median (IQR): 20.0 (14.1-26.7), 26.0 (20.5-34.0) and 44.5 (34.5-48.0), respectively, p<0.0001). Among invasively ventilated patients, RALE scores were significantly associated with worse respiratory mechanics (plateau and driving pressure) and gas exchange metrics (PaO2/FiO2 and ventilatory ratio), as well as higher plasma levels of IL-6, soluble receptor of advanced glycation end-products and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (p<0.05). RALE scores were independently associated with 90-day survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted HR 1.04 (1.02-1.07), p=0.002). We replicated the significant associations of RALE scores with baseline disease severity and mortality in the independent validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: With a reproducible method to measure radiographic severity in COVID-19, we found significant associations with clinical and physiologic severity, host inflammation and clinical outcomes. The incorporation of radiographic severity assessments in clinical decision-making may provide important guidance for prognostication and treatment allocation in COVID-19.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e066626
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 12 2023

Keywords

  • Adult intensive & critical care
  • COVID-19
  • Respiratory infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-rater reliability and prognostic value of baseline Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) scores in observational cohort studies of inpatients with COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this