TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-observer Variability in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
T2 - In-Depth Analysis and Areas for Improvement
AU - Itani, Malak
AU - Assaker, Richard
AU - Moshiri, Mariam
AU - Dubinsky, Theodore J.
AU - Dighe, Manjiri K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced a new standardized system for management of thyroid nodules, the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the inter-observer variability in applying TI-RADS in clinical practice without prior dedicated training. We evaluated a total of 180 nodules constituting all consecutive thyroid aspirations performed in the radiology department between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014, with exclusion of histologically inadequate samples. Four radiologists, blinded to each other's evaluation and to final pathology results, evaluated all of the nodules based on the TI-RADS lexicon. TI-RADS score and management recommendations were then deduced from the inputted features. Statistical analysis was performed to determine inter-observer agreement among all readers, as well as between each two readers, in all TI-RADS sonographic features and for recommended management per TI-RADS score with multi-user Cohen's κ (Light's κ) and percentage agreement using R. There was fair-to-moderate inter-observer agreement in nodule composition (two-reader κ range: 0.327–0.533) and presence of calcifications (κ range: 0.229–0.527), but poor-to-fair agreement in echogenicity (κ range: 0.141–0.355), shape (κ range: 0.0729–0.513) and margins (κ range: 0.176–0.283). There was fair inter-observer agreement regarding management recommendations (κ range: 0.242–0.359).
AB - The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced a new standardized system for management of thyroid nodules, the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the inter-observer variability in applying TI-RADS in clinical practice without prior dedicated training. We evaluated a total of 180 nodules constituting all consecutive thyroid aspirations performed in the radiology department between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2014, with exclusion of histologically inadequate samples. Four radiologists, blinded to each other's evaluation and to final pathology results, evaluated all of the nodules based on the TI-RADS lexicon. TI-RADS score and management recommendations were then deduced from the inputted features. Statistical analysis was performed to determine inter-observer agreement among all readers, as well as between each two readers, in all TI-RADS sonographic features and for recommended management per TI-RADS score with multi-user Cohen's κ (Light's κ) and percentage agreement using R. There was fair-to-moderate inter-observer agreement in nodule composition (two-reader κ range: 0.327–0.533) and presence of calcifications (κ range: 0.229–0.527), but poor-to-fair agreement in echogenicity (κ range: 0.141–0.355), shape (κ range: 0.0729–0.513) and margins (κ range: 0.176–0.283). There was fair inter-observer agreement regarding management recommendations (κ range: 0.242–0.359).
KW - Agreement
KW - American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
KW - Inter-observer
KW - Management
KW - Thyroid nodule
KW - Variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056147212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.026
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 30415880
AN - SCOPUS:85056147212
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 45
SP - 461
EP - 470
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 2
ER -