TY - JOUR
T1 - Intensity-modulated radiotherapy increases dose to the brachial plexus compared with conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
AU - Chen, A. M.
AU - Hall, W. H.
AU - Li, B. Q.
AU - Guiou, M.
AU - Wright, C.
AU - Mathai, M.
AU - Dublin, A.
AU - Purdy, J. A.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Objective: The preferential use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer has raised concerns regarding dose to non-target tissue. The purpose of this study was to compare dose-volume characteristics with the brachial plexus between treatment plans generated by IMRT and CRT using several common treatment scenarios. Method: The brachial plexus was delineated on radiation treatment planning CT scans from 10 patients undergoing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer using a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed atlas. No brachial plexus constraint was used. For each patient, a conventional three-field shrinking-field plan was generated and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for the brachial plexus was compared with that of the IMRT plan. Results: The mean irradiated volumes of the brachial plexus using the IMRT vs the CRT plan, respectively, were as follows: V50 (18±5 ml) vs (11±6 ml), p=0.01; V60 (6±4 ml) vs (3±3 ml), p50.02; V66 (3±1 ml) vs (1±1 ml), p=0.04, V70 (0±1 ml) vs (0±1 ml), p=0.68. The maximum point dose to the brachial plexus was 68.9 Gy (range 62.3- 78.7 Gy) and 66.1 Gy (range 60.2-75.6 Gy) for the IMRT and CRT plans, respectively (p=0.01). Conclusion: Dose to the brachial plexus is significantly increased among patients undergoing IMRT compared with CRT for head and neck cancer. Preliminary studies on brachial plexus-sparing IMRT are in progress.
AB - Objective: The preferential use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer has raised concerns regarding dose to non-target tissue. The purpose of this study was to compare dose-volume characteristics with the brachial plexus between treatment plans generated by IMRT and CRT using several common treatment scenarios. Method: The brachial plexus was delineated on radiation treatment planning CT scans from 10 patients undergoing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer using a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-endorsed atlas. No brachial plexus constraint was used. For each patient, a conventional three-field shrinking-field plan was generated and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for the brachial plexus was compared with that of the IMRT plan. Results: The mean irradiated volumes of the brachial plexus using the IMRT vs the CRT plan, respectively, were as follows: V50 (18±5 ml) vs (11±6 ml), p=0.01; V60 (6±4 ml) vs (3±3 ml), p50.02; V66 (3±1 ml) vs (1±1 ml), p=0.04, V70 (0±1 ml) vs (0±1 ml), p=0.68. The maximum point dose to the brachial plexus was 68.9 Gy (range 62.3- 78.7 Gy) and 66.1 Gy (range 60.2-75.6 Gy) for the IMRT and CRT plans, respectively (p=0.01). Conclusion: Dose to the brachial plexus is significantly increased among patients undergoing IMRT compared with CRT for head and neck cancer. Preliminary studies on brachial plexus-sparing IMRT are in progress.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650658206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/bjr/62332495
DO - 10.1259/bjr/62332495
M3 - Article
C2 - 20858665
AN - SCOPUS:78650658206
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 84
SP - 58
EP - 63
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 997
ER -