Integrated bottom-up and top-down proteomics of patient-derived breast tumor xenografts

  • Ioanna Ntai
  • , Richard D. LeDuc
  • , Ryan T. Fellers
  • , Petra Erdmann-Gilmore
  • , Sherri R. Davies
  • , Jeanne Rumsey
  • , Bryan P. Early
  • , Paul M. Thomas
  • , Shunqiang Li
  • , Philip D. Compton
  • , Matthew J.C. Ellis
  • , Kelly V. Ruggles
  • , David Fenyö
  • , Emily S. Boja
  • , Henry Rodriguez
  • , R. Reid Townsend
  • , Neil L. Kelleher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Bottom-up proteomics relies on the use of proteases and is the method of choice for identifying thousands of protein groups in complex samples. Top-down proteomics has been shown to be robust for direct analysis of small proteins and offers a solution to the "peptide-to-protein" inference problem inherent with bottom-up approaches. Here, we describe the first large-scale integration of genomic, bottom-up and top-down proteomic data for the comparative analysis of patient-derived mouse xenograft models of basal and luminal B human breast cancer, WHIM2 and WHIM16, respectively. Using these well-characterized xenograft models established by the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we compared and contrasted the performance of bottom-up and top-down proteomics to detect cancer-specific aberrations at the peptide and proteoform levels and to measure differential expression of proteins and proteoforms. Bottom-up proteomic analysis of the tumor xenografts detected almost 10 times as many coding nucleotide polymorphisms and peptides resulting from novel splice junctions than top-down. For proteins in the range of 0-30 kDa, where quantitation was performed using both approaches, bottom-up proteomics quantified 3,519 protein groups from 49,185 peptides, while topdown proteomics quantified 982 proteoforms mapping to 358 proteins. Examples of both concordant and discordant quantitation were found in a ~60:40 ratio, providing a unique opportunity for top-down to fill in missing information. The two techniques showed complementary performance, with bottom-up yielding eight times more identifications of 0-30 kDa proteins in xenograft proteomes, but failing to detect differences in certain posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as phosphorylation pattern changes of alpha-endosulfine. This work illustrates the potency of a combined bottom-up and top-down proteomics approach to deepen our knowledge of cancer biology, especially when genomic data are available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-56
Number of pages12
JournalMolecular and Cellular Proteomics
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated bottom-up and top-down proteomics of patient-derived breast tumor xenografts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this