TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated bottom-up and top-down proteomics of patient-derived breast tumor xenografts
AU - Ntai, Ioanna
AU - LeDuc, Richard D.
AU - Fellers, Ryan T.
AU - Erdmann-Gilmore, Petra
AU - Davies, Sherri R.
AU - Rumsey, Jeanne
AU - Early, Bryan P.
AU - Thomas, Paul M.
AU - Li, Shunqiang
AU - Compton, Philip D.
AU - Ellis, Matthew J.C.
AU - Ruggles, Kelly V.
AU - Fenyö, David
AU - Boja, Emily S.
AU - Rodriguez, Henry
AU - Townsend, R. Reid
AU - Kelleher, Neil L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Gordon Whiteley for guidance in study design and would like to thank the following members of the Kelleher Research Group/Proteomics Center of Excellence for helpful discussions: Joseph Greer, Luca Fornelli, and Kenneth Durbin. The expert technical assistance of Rose Connors, Anne Kettler, and James Malone at the Washington University CPTAC Proteome Characterization Center is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by Award No. GM067193 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NLK), Federal Funds from the National Cancer Institute (Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research), National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E, and the Office for Research at Northwestern University. This research was also partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. ABI-1062432 to Indiana University (RDL). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views of policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Center for Genome Analysis Support, Northwestern University, or Indiana University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
N2 - Bottom-up proteomics relies on the use of proteases and is the method of choice for identifying thousands of protein groups in complex samples. Top-down proteomics has been shown to be robust for direct analysis of small proteins and offers a solution to the "peptide-to-protein" inference problem inherent with bottom-up approaches. Here, we describe the first large-scale integration of genomic, bottom-up and top-down proteomic data for the comparative analysis of patient-derived mouse xenograft models of basal and luminal B human breast cancer, WHIM2 and WHIM16, respectively. Using these well-characterized xenograft models established by the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we compared and contrasted the performance of bottom-up and top-down proteomics to detect cancer-specific aberrations at the peptide and proteoform levels and to measure differential expression of proteins and proteoforms. Bottom-up proteomic analysis of the tumor xenografts detected almost 10 times as many coding nucleotide polymorphisms and peptides resulting from novel splice junctions than top-down. For proteins in the range of 0-30 kDa, where quantitation was performed using both approaches, bottom-up proteomics quantified 3,519 protein groups from 49,185 peptides, while topdown proteomics quantified 982 proteoforms mapping to 358 proteins. Examples of both concordant and discordant quantitation were found in a ~60:40 ratio, providing a unique opportunity for top-down to fill in missing information. The two techniques showed complementary performance, with bottom-up yielding eight times more identifications of 0-30 kDa proteins in xenograft proteomes, but failing to detect differences in certain posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as phosphorylation pattern changes of alpha-endosulfine. This work illustrates the potency of a combined bottom-up and top-down proteomics approach to deepen our knowledge of cancer biology, especially when genomic data are available.
AB - Bottom-up proteomics relies on the use of proteases and is the method of choice for identifying thousands of protein groups in complex samples. Top-down proteomics has been shown to be robust for direct analysis of small proteins and offers a solution to the "peptide-to-protein" inference problem inherent with bottom-up approaches. Here, we describe the first large-scale integration of genomic, bottom-up and top-down proteomic data for the comparative analysis of patient-derived mouse xenograft models of basal and luminal B human breast cancer, WHIM2 and WHIM16, respectively. Using these well-characterized xenograft models established by the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we compared and contrasted the performance of bottom-up and top-down proteomics to detect cancer-specific aberrations at the peptide and proteoform levels and to measure differential expression of proteins and proteoforms. Bottom-up proteomic analysis of the tumor xenografts detected almost 10 times as many coding nucleotide polymorphisms and peptides resulting from novel splice junctions than top-down. For proteins in the range of 0-30 kDa, where quantitation was performed using both approaches, bottom-up proteomics quantified 3,519 protein groups from 49,185 peptides, while topdown proteomics quantified 982 proteoforms mapping to 358 proteins. Examples of both concordant and discordant quantitation were found in a ~60:40 ratio, providing a unique opportunity for top-down to fill in missing information. The two techniques showed complementary performance, with bottom-up yielding eight times more identifications of 0-30 kDa proteins in xenograft proteomes, but failing to detect differences in certain posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as phosphorylation pattern changes of alpha-endosulfine. This work illustrates the potency of a combined bottom-up and top-down proteomics approach to deepen our knowledge of cancer biology, especially when genomic data are available.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955463692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1074/mcp.M114.047480
DO - 10.1074/mcp.M114.047480
M3 - Article
C2 - 26503891
AN - SCOPUS:84955463692
SN - 1535-9476
VL - 15
SP - 45
EP - 56
JO - Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
JF - Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
IS - 1
ER -