Insurance expansion in massachusetts did not reduce access among previously insured medicare patients

Karen E. Joynt, David Chan, E. John Orav, Ashish K. Jha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Critics of Massachusetts's health reform, a model for the Affordable Care Act, have argued that insurance expansion probably had a negative spillover effect leading to worse outcomes among already insured patients, such as vulnerable Medicare patients. Using Medicare data from 2004 to 2009, we examined trends in preventable hospitalizations for conditions such as uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes-markers of access to effective primary care-in Massachusetts compared to control states. We found that after Massachusetts's health reform, preventable hospitalization rates for Medicare patients actually decreased more in Massachusetts than in control states (a reduction of 101 admissions per 100,000 patients per quarter compared to a reduction of 83 admissions). Therefore, we found no evidence that Massachusetts's insurance expansion had a deleterious spillover effect on preventable hospitalizations among the previously insured. Our findings should offer some reassurance that it is possible to expand access to uninsured Americans without negatively affecting important clinical outcomes for those who are already insured.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-578
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Insurance expansion in massachusetts did not reduce access among previously insured medicare patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this