Abstract
In recent years, drug manufacturers and private payers have expressed interest in novel pricing models that more closely link a drug's price to its value. Indication-based pricing, outcome-based pricing, drug licenses, and drug mortgages have all been discussed as alternatives to paying strictly for volume. Manufacturers and payers have complained, however, that Medicaid's "best-price rule" inhibits their ability to enter into these newpricing arrangements. This article examines the best-price rule and assesses to what extent, if any, it might frustrate the goal of paying for value.We conclude that the best-price rule is not as serious a problem as it is sometimes made out to be but that it is also not simply a convenient excuse for refusing to try something new. The law here is complex, and moving to a pay-for-value model for drugs will require close coordination among manufacturers, payers, and regulators.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-18 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2018 |
Keywords
- Best-price rule
- Medicaid
- Outcome-based pricing
- Pharmaceutical pricing
- Value-based payment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Innovative contracting for pharmaceuticals and medicaid's best-price rule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver